It turned out to be a "war movie" of stream of consciousness. The discussion and thinking about human nature and moral always make me question the meaning of liberal arts and even begin to question the meaning of philosophy. That non-standard discussion depends on one's own limitations. In the Western Philosophy class, I once said that Westerners use the so-called "civilization" to disturb the primitive tribes. The unjust and misfortune discussed in this semester's class I tried to give them the maximum meaning from the perspective of human nature and civilization, but this civilization is not really related to moral Is it necessary? Does it make us respect each other more or does it bind us or does something like this without universal standards go overboard? I agree with the advancement of black and women's power. I've also heard that race is inherently good and bad when it comes to rationality. For example, the black tribes in primitive society will be suspected of extinction. I still hold this view to this day. Governments have long since lost their original intention of being empowered by their citizens to protect their own citizens. They compete with the outside world for a place. It may not be so easy for the citizens of countries where weak countries have no diplomacy and lose power. So back to the original point, the world is too complicated. Perhaps the human nature is to plunder and fight. The so-called communism and Datong society are the ideological realm that human beings can never reach. Suddenly I thought about those so-called "insulting the law" whether the French people are generally aware of the consequences of the war by sitting at the dinner table like in the movies Those meaningless scrambles They are not even "civilizing" the locals and farming with them And the war and colonial America was just an attempt to defeat an imaginary enemy. Lance is the crazy character that made me discover the man brought by the war in the first place. He slowly lost the man who surfed and lived in the sinking or everyday reality. He became a stream of consciousness, like an artist, just following his instincts. In short, he lost the shackles of modern society. He painted green on his face and stuck a wooden arrow on his head. He panicked and looked at the dog. I kind of love him in this state. That unfettered self. War may be inherently anti-human. Under the influence of a civilized society, we understand that the same kind must be friendly to each other, but those who stand on the battlefield must lose all these people who have truly lost the shackles of morality and education. Morality. One kills one lover. The colonel at the beginning of the film bombarded and wanted to feed the Viet Cong soldiers with water. He said that as long as the soldiers fought on the battlefield, they should be respected. I think he has confused the whole of the Viet Cong as an enemy that has to be hunted down, but he has a moral sense of the same kind in the face of real individuals. credits marlon says Those who are happy to kill are actually real people with families and joys and sorrows. Perhaps winning a war requires abandoning good humanity. But people are multi-faceted. I have been saying Hesse for a long time. Suddenly, it occurred to me that people are multi-faceted precisely because the world is too complicated. We have to face countless alienated scenes. Just like a soldier would never go to the battlefield before he went to the battlefield. Knowing that there is still this side of the self that can be brutally murdered. The multifaceted nature of a person grows out of experience. Oh, I suddenly understood the phrase in philosophy class that man is generated. A person cannot be defined. Philosophy may be necessary. If the world can generally begin to think about these issues, many disputes may be self-solved.
And the playboy girl in the film made me think directly of America's defeat in the Vietnam War. Democracy is the same thing with the right intentions. It may be beneficial to the further growth of human beings in the beginning, but when everything goes out of control and loses the bottom line, it is plundered like the noisy cries of today's democratic world. It always makes me feel that they have lost what they had. the benefits of democracy. And we ourselves are watching the lively and developing to the other extreme. People are obedient and unaware of reflection like slaves. But it is also understandable that Camus said that true philosophical thinking is suicide. Heidegger's sinking into everyday life and the free choice to think bravely may not actually be that "free". The world is still complicated, and most of the human beings can't bear too much thinking and thinking may really drive people crazy. So people choose to stick with one thought and have to use one thought and principle to rule their entire life. Humans have become slaves to their own minds.
View more about Apocalypse Now reviews
