Therefore, the first part has not reached the depth of discussing human rights and resisting oppression, but only a shallow taste! But the second film is different. It feels like a qualitative leap to me. It can also be said that the second film has really gotten rid of the teenage fan-oriented movie. After a search on the Internet, I found out that the second film has changed the director and screenwriter. The Ministry first re-created the emotional entanglement between Keates, Peeta, and Gale under the endgame left by the first part. There is no so-called love triangle, only the true love between Keith and Gale, Keith and Gale. The deep feeling of sharing weal and woe between Peeta is simple and clear, and the most important thing is to portray Kats as the winner of the game, going to various districts to face the underclass people in disguised speeches, showing his determination to fight against Congress, and at the same time when the Mockingjay spreads its wings. That moment really highlighted the determination of the people at the bottom to rise up and resist under the brutal repression!
An important plot in the second part-in the interview the night before the game, all the players (the former champions of each district) boycotted the game hand in hand, no matter how ruthless and cruel they were on the game field, they still did their best How could I not wish all this to happen, under this kind of totalitarian rule, it seems so profound and helpless! The plot design of the next game is also quite excellent, reaching a certain Hollywood commercial level, and the wonderful performances of the comprehensive actors, "The Hunger Games 2: Catching Fire" is definitely a commercial masterpiece with deep thinking!
PS: I have watched IMAX twice before, and both times are the ending game part, because after the game starts, the screen will reach the IMAX full screen effect. Looking at it now, I regret not watching the whole film!
View more about The Hunger Games: Catching Fire reviews