One of the clues in this part is that the heroine gradually becomes a symbol that she cannot control. She has her own destiny and family to maintain, but she is pinned so much hope by the people that her own destiny is actually controlled by the people. Fate kidnapped. Emotionally, the heroine is obviously a part of the rebels, but intellectually she doesn't feel that she can shoulder her responsibilities. She began to find that the rebels did not regard her as a sentimental person, but turned her into a flag under the cover of undercover, and even her sister and mother began to refuse her to continue to play the role of a daughter, hoping that she could become a world-renowned savior. It can be said that at this time the heroine has signs of falling into the confusion of identity. Feel the insignificance of its unstoppable and personal power in the torrent of the times. This film provides such a perspective, showing that the characters who are generally considered to drive history are actually chess pieces of history, and necessity and fatalism implicitly determine the direction of history. I haven't read the original book, but the expression change after the ending movie is worth pondering. Because this scene marks the awakening of the heroine's self-awareness. From then on, she is no longer a messenger of authority, and no longer tolerates herself being a pawn of the resistance army. She begins to pay attention to her love and hate, and is likely to go To break the rules and rules. In general, although it is a book for a slightly younger age group, because the tone of the story and the main line are designed on such a background, the subsequent stories have great potential for mining. It is not ruled out that the actress has the possibility of "adding drama" through her acting skills.
View more about The Hunger Games: Catching Fire reviews
