I now find that it is very easy to make an arbitrary judgment on any film. Especially for Marvel, as long as it is not made by joss whedon, it may be very difficult for me to judge correctly. I find that when I watch the film, I can really Many details are missed.
Ever since I listened to the prospect of Blackwater Park Women's Federation 4, Jinhua said that Thor turned from arrogance to modesty, I was very curious, what is humility, so I opened the Thor trilogy to learn what humility is. However, I didn't find it. Thor never does Modest, Thor has always felt that he is the strongest, in terms of combat effectiveness, the Women's Federation has also shown many times that Thor is an existence that rivals hulk,
So what exactly does the Thor series say, aside from the story of the Women's Federation, the Thor series is actually a story of how a rich second generation inherits the family business. It is a process of success from the beginning to the final strength. In order to increase the real sense of crisis, it also created a Rival loki, which makes Thor seem to have a difficult time inheriting the throne.
But Thor's value system feels messy to me, especially Thor 1, you say it's normal to be demoted Asgard for being arrogant and easy to provoke too much believing that it's easy to do the wrong thing, but then the hammer came back because he had The spirit of sacrificing for the partner, what the hell is this, did Thor not have the spirit of sacrifice before? I'm very confused. You said that Thor's attack on the Frost Giant destroyed the armistice contract, that Thor was arbitrary, and the two ends of the loki snake and rat almost killed Frost. It's amazing that the Rainbow Bridge was smashed by Thor. Even Thor had to sacrifice the chance to meet Jane to organize loki. I don't know why. I don't know what Thor's growth is.
The growth of Thor 2 will be a little clearer, but it seems that the growth is more loki, and the two have changed from a competitive relationship to a cooperative relationship because of the death of their mother. Thor seems to have lost interest in the throne, resulting in a less intense competition for the throne. loki was the ruler of Asgard for 2 years, and Thor didn't know what to do, until Thor 3, Thor didn't remember to stop the Ragnarok of the gods, and when teleporting, he couldn't find Heldham, only to find that loki had ruled It's been 2 years. And it seems that the common people have been doing pretty well for the past 2 years.
Then I remembered that Odin was lost. Looking for Odin led to the discovery of my sister, who followed them and occupied Asgard. Suddenly I found that Thor is really a scourge.
Finally, after 2 and a half episodes of trance, Thor's Odyssey finally began, from losing the hammer, to the arena training, to persuading loki and Valkyrie to join his plan, cooperating with loki, Valkyrie and the Hulk, and fighting back home. In order to destroy the sea Pull, release the evil god, and transfer the people. On the last spaceship, it seems that loki is also convinced by thor and bows his head.
The problem is, the value system of this film is only chaotic, if it really follows the plot, it's as naive as a fairy tale.
Thor questioned that Hela could not be king by provoking wars from all walks of life. But didn't he do it before? Why would he have a second chance. And as a monarchical feudal country, not going out to start foreign wars is the only way to meet the Contrary to the characters, you ask for a country with absolute strength (Odin has so many treasures) but to maintain peace with the outside world, so how did these nine countries come from? Can you have it as long as you protect the people like Thor Then why are you still afraid of the Frost Giant and keep loki as a hostage? Since there is a hostage, why did you destroy the Frost Giant when you were strong? Why did you beat someone else inexplicably, and ended up retreating after half the fight? It's incredible.
And in Thor 3, loki, who is also very inexplicable, listens to Thor's words inexplicably, and seems to have transferred the throne battle between loki and thor to the throne battle between Hela and thor. The first half of Thor 1 and the second half of Thor 3 There is no sense of disobedience in the combination. Loki is a tool person, and seems to be the second personality of Thor.
Well, after thinking about it, I still can't believe what Jinhua said. It's still too naive to think about life through popcorn movies. Especially the Marvel movies, in order to build the universe, they really do whatever they want, and they often stray from the topic and keep running, for you It is hard to add flowers and brainwashing. Because it is a movie, in fact, regardless of the plot or the characters, there is always a sense of rupture. And it is difficult for the audience to penetrate.
Really really only the Women's Federation 1 is a good script.
View more about Thor: Ragnarok reviews
