Captain America 3 should be the most meaningful #Marvel movie# . It is difficult to answer a series of questions raised by it: For example, is the self-developed black technology a kind of power or a right? Does it apply to the Second Amendment? What is the basis for nationalization of force?
Captain America 3 continues the connotation of Avengers 2 in connotation, and tries to dig deeper. The following attempts to analyze:
The Roots of Superhero Movies
If you ask what is the foundation of superhero movies, I think there is no doubt that it is the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which legitimizes armed civilians, and has a very long history in a tradition that originated in England, and Sherlock Holmes is the Another branch of a tradition.
"A regulated force is necessary to ensure the security of a free nation, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is inviolable."
This is the biggest difference between superheroes and oriental knights: oriental knights act based on personal value judgments, while superheroes' rights come from the law, that is, Rule OF Law. So we can get out of the chaos and explore the politics of superheroes, and the questions that arise
Avengers 2
In Avengers 2, the entire story is based on two political views of the last few hundred years:
Conservatism: Avoiding a Worse Future. Believing that human nature is mean and insignificant, governments formed by human beings are especially susceptible to corruption, and based on Christian tradition (separation of church and state), conscience should be reserved for individuals, not governments, conservatives tend to act in order to preserve freedom and experience-based traditions , does not act for ideas that have no practical basis. We know that the representative of this type of person is the US team. Historically, typical conservative actions such as the American Independence Movement, people had to take up arms in order to protect their rights from being violated by British (and then homeland) statutes.
Progressivism: Building a Better Future. It is believed that man is sure to conquer the sky, and as long as it is based on the correct theory, man can create heaven on earth and create great happiness. The representative of this type of person is the Iron Man. In historically typical progressive actions such as the French Revolution, people rose up for the principles of liberty, democracy and equality that had no practical application.
In Avengers 2, Iron Man created Ultron based on his own theory and without experience. This is the big problem of progressivism, and the same is true of the great revolution that created tyranny. But at the end, an accident that gave birth to a vision wiped out the mistake.
I myself tend to be conservative, so I will use a conservative perspective in the future. If you don’t like it, please spray it. I don’t care.
Should it be signed?
First signature is not required. In the U.S. Constitution, citizens are not obliged to hand over their power and technology to the state, which belongs to the citizens themselves, that is, a right. It is unconstitutional if the state seizes power by force. But the country can make the superheroes sign one by one based on the agreement, which is no problem.
In my opinion, if Iron Man and Captain America can't even trust themselves, it is actually a more dangerous choice to delegate this right to the politicians. But as an organization like the Avengers, it's fucking bad that it didn't adopt Robert's rules of procedure. The heroes of the Avengers should have a specific charter for voting, which will be commanded by delegating the task to the US team in the future.
Progressives believed in human nature, and the abdication of their responsibility was revealed, and the Iron Man delegated this right to the government. In fact, when he gave up a right, he also gave up a responsibility that should have been his own - which made the whole thing even more dangerous. As history has shown, the sages of the United States firmly grasped their responsibilities and resolutely freed themselves from the motherland to have a freer and better future.
Should the Winter Soldier be killed?
Nonsense, of course he should be arrested and tried before killing, other than that he can only be killed when he is killing. It's definitely not right for Iron Man to come and lynch.
I'm too lazy to say anything else. To sum up, I stand for the US team, choose rights, choose conscience, and choose procedural justice!
View more about Captain America: Civil War reviews
