Speaking of plots and concepts, superheroes will always be questioned because they are outside the rules of ordinary people, but the rules of ordinary people are based on the abilities of ordinary people.
But such people are always needed, otherwise quantitative changes will never lead to qualitative changes. How much is appropriate for the so-called accumulation to a certain extent? How many quantitative changes inevitably lead to qualitative changes? Nobody knows. I don't think there will be a qualitative change without the special people who break through these rules.
People with special abilities have the ability to control and judge, and are willing to take the greatest responsibility and take the greatest risks. Their lives will not be content with peace, but they will always be envied by ordinary people, especially those with more power but less ability than them. , expecting them to fail or even die.
When people with superior ability make mistakes, their influence will be equally large, so their psychology will also face greater pressure. Once they collapse, it will be more difficult to rebuild their psychology. Movies can always turn corruption into magic, but in reality, everyone is more looking forward to seeing Jiang Lang's talents come to an end, and the sad ending of genius is often like this.
View more about Captain America: Civil War reviews
