A well-deserved movie classic. It is also better than the first two in terms of theme content and artistic technique, very good, really good. Eastwood is so beautiful...my eyes were on blondie the whole movie. The lens, the impeccable lens, is touching that the plot is not at all sloppy. Thanks director. That kind of anti-war propaganda directly hit my humanistic feelings. It is rare. The human nature exposed in the bloody war is real, and it appears evil because of its truth.
The good I guess is an ideal type, quite romantic, he is calm, calm, arrogant but kind from beginning to end. What touched me the most was that he gave Cigar to the dying soldiers, and once again admired the director's profound shaping of human nature in such small shots, and at the same time pushed the film to the climax of a war tragedy, but not only that. The long shot of Tut running through the cemetery at the end is awe-inspiring, the background is blurred, the characters stand out, and I wonder what exactly does he represent, is it a pansexual evil? The line between the ugly and the bad isn't too clear (maybe because I didn't realize it), but the ugly has a lot of kinship. His conversations with his priestly brother, and his later innocuous lies to Blondie in the carriage, may reflect a childishness about him, his greed, and his ignorance, which feels more compassion than criticism. But the bad is purely a bad guy, a face opposite to a good guy, but not closely related. Tut is real, but the other two protagonists are just abstract symbols, which is really fun.
Finally, praise the music again!
View more about The Good, the Bad and the Ugly reviews
