I know that a movie does not only need to have a story, and the plot and plot do not necessarily have to be the first element of a movie. It is also necessary to weaken the plot if necessary. The content of the story is also very important.
However, I can't stand the dullness. I didn't check it out, but I think the box office of such a dull movie might not be so good. This must be a literary film with a layer of commercial skin.
There are too many plots in the movie that can be complained about, but I know that the connotation is the first. The film omits a lot of plots that should be logically and rigorously expressed, and goes straight to the theme, which leads to the fact that the thinking progress during the viewing process is not as smooth as the tasks in the film.
The themes of the film also seem to be cryptic. With little talent and little knowledge, it seems to have discussed the following topics:
1. An eternal theme, the definition of human beings, the right to live. 2. Whether a replicator's right to exist should be decided by human beings. Replicants have no right to live.
If the theme of the movie I analyzed is passable, then I really think it's a really ridiculous theme. The fact that replicants, something that only exists in science fiction and movies, suddenly come out and say "I want to survive", and that so many people are thinking about it, is ridiculous enough in itself.
There are many images in the movie, but very few can be understood. The movie also keeps suggesting that the protagonists Deckard and Gaff are androids, but I don't see how that has anything to do with the theme. What if the protagonist is an artificial human, and what if he is not? There is simply no way to make the film more meaningful.
If it's a really good movie, then what I've seen should be few and far between, and given my viewing experience, I wouldn't recommend this movie easily, most people I know can't accept this veiledness shooting and connotation.
View more about Blade Runner reviews
