my feeling

Milan 2022-04-22 07:01:02

This is an nb movie, a movie that hits my g-spot. Crazy like a tornado raging inside me!

In a small room, the comments of twelve jurors determine the life of a teenager. This is a case of murdering a father, and the fact that the witnesses and materials are complete makes it indisputable that the boy was sent to the electric chair.

The first vote was 11 guilty and 1 innocent. At 1:11, the windy review process begins! Henry Fonda raised his various conjectures and questions, followed by other jurors who raised their own questions. The problem of using the knife gesture, the roar of the tram passing by, the time it took to witness the process, all kinds of details are shown one by one. Even the small details such as the imprints left by wearing glasses are cut out. Jurors gradually began to change their attitudes and voted not guilty. During the process of voting from 1:11 to 2:10 to 3:9 to 11:1, each juror's character, temperament, and standpoint were clearly displayed.

I don't want to be specific about the plot, and I don't want to discuss the system the film is going to show. I just want to write about what I feel. All the anger points of the 12 angry men, the breaking points of the plot, burst out in the discussion, and the whole discussion process was violent and ferocious like a tornado. Unreasonable rage rages in my heart.

When the situation was basically determined, the last juror was not guilty, which pushed the movie to its climax. He looked at the photo of him and his son, shredded the photo angrily, smashed it on the table angrily, cried bitterly, and shouted not guilty. This clip, like a powder keg or even an atomic bomb, exploded at the most sensitive point of my emotions, destroying everything. An angry man was crying bitterly, so heartbreakingly, so distressingly. At this time, he must have thought of his so-called son who "destroyed his own life". He hated that he did not give him a good education and a good family relationship.

The tornado hit and gradually returned to calm. All that was left in the room were a few shredded photo fragments and countless soot. The final result was an expected 12 votes not guilty. The boy's life was freed from the electric chair.

I thought of Toki's "Unforgivable". Why can the killer played by Dongmu kill a group of people by himself? Just because he dared to shoot. A single bullet can kill a person, and each dead person has his own parents, wives, children, brothers and friends. A bullet can end a life, and what is even more terrifying is that it also cuts off all life connections. Under the weight of life, who dares to pull the trigger?

Life is the greatest thing, be in awe of it!

View more about 12 Angry Men reviews

Extended Reading
  • Vito 2022-03-23 09:01:09

    The number eight is so awesome! ! 1vs11

  • Clotilde 2022-04-24 07:01:02

    [A+] An extremely powerful masterpiece, from the director's script to the actors are impeccable. It is difficult for a small pattern to create conflict itself, so most of the same themes choose to borrow location; and except for the three scenes at the beginning and the end of the film, there is no location in the whole film, and it all takes place in a small room, but it creates such a strong dramatic conflict. is a miracle. The whole film is very coherent, coherent, fast-paced, but also knows to relax the audience during the intermission at the appropriate time, and constantly enrich the characters during the break, and finally all the details of the whole film are impeccable. Unlike conventional suspense films, perhaps this film cannot be called a suspense film - the outcome of the case is not important, the case itself is the point. There is a strong collision between different people and different values. There is no truth. What they seek is only "possibility". Conscience was stifled by boredom at first, but it was constantly awakened in the collision, and everyone slowly took up their responsibility for a strange life.

12 Angry Men quotes

  • Juror #3: [when Juror #11 questions whether the boy would return home to retrieve the knife] Look, you voted guilty. What side are ya on?

    Juror #11: I don't believe I have to be loyal to one side or the other. I'm simply asking questions.

  • Juror #8: I just want to talk.

    Juror #7: Well, what's there to talk about? Eleven men in here think he's guilty. No one had to think about it twice except you.

    Juror #10: I want to to ask you something: do you believe his story?

    Juror #8: I don't know whether I believe it or not - maybe I don't.

    Juror #7: So how come you vote not guilty?

    Juror #8: Well, there were eleven votes for guilty. It's not easy to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.

    Juror #7: Well now, who says it's easy?

    Juror #8: No one.

    Juror #7: What, just because I voted fast? I honestly think the guy's guilty. Couldn't change my mind if you talked for a hundred years.

    Juror #8: I'm not trying to change your mind. It's just that... we're talking about somebody's life here. We can't decide it in five minutes. Supposing we're wrong?

    Juror #7: Supposing we're wrong! Supposing this whole building should fall down on my head. You can suppose anything!

    Juror #8: That's right.