Twelve Angry Men: A Utopian Redemption

Marietta 2022-04-21 09:01:11

The central case in this film - the murder of a father by a son, reminds me of the famous work "The Outsider" in the history of Western modernist literature (モダニズム Literature) by the French writer Albert Camus. 'Étranger (Japanese "foreigner"). Among them, the male protagonist (Japanese name: ムルソー) was tried at the same time, and there was also a case in which his son killed his father. The kind of absurdity disclosed in this novel (Japanese: unorganized), alienation Alienation is an indictment of modernity and a revelation of the ruthless and inhuman alienation of the modern judicial system. In the novel, the protagonist, a law-abiding ordinary clerk, committed an accidental murder by ムルソー. I didn't cry at my mother's funeral, and I was convicted of intentional homicide when the details of my life were excavated, and finally I was sentenced to death. And one detail in the novel has always made me curious, that was considered to be the most important news in that season. Hype point How will the murder of his father be tried?

The central case in "Twelve Angry Men" is the son's murder of his father, and the trial time is similar to Camus' novel "The Outsider", which is a hot summer. This 1957 film , undoubtedly makes people aware of its potential affinity with Camus' novel "The Outsider" written in 1942.

Of course, the difference is also obvious. Camus let the protagonist ムルソー be sentenced to death in judicial silence, In "Ten", the young man who killed his father (although the judicial process in the United States does not seem to be better than that in France, and does not give the defendant a chance to appeal) was fortunate enough to meet the 8th jury's argument, and finally persuaded Eleven other members of the jury were acquitted.

"The Outsider" permeates the pessimistic atmosphere of Camus' existentialism (じつぞんしゅぎ, English: Existentialism), which is also followed by "The Myth of シーシュポスのMyth" Le Mythe de Sisyphe set the tone for the discussion of "argumentation", "human world", and "creation". It is a criticism of reason (りせい、reasion) Trust is also the reflection and questioning of rationality and science by Western thinkers who have experienced World War II, as well as the Western civilization dominated by them.

On the contrary, the sense of justice of Juror No. 8 in "Twelve Angry Men", the serious attitude towards people's life and death, and the logical analysis of Chengtang's testimony are Kant (カント, Immanuel Kant) style. In Camus's view, it is such Kantian reason as metaphysics (metaphysics (けいじじょうがく, English: Metaphysics, mono: Metaphysik)) that lays the foundation for the absurdity (incoherence) of Western modernity. Conversely, the villain in the film is either accused of being cynic or implied to be irrational. At the end of the film, people are persuaded by a series of arguments, and even the last person agrees to acquit the young man because he gave up his personal irrational attachment, which seems to be a victory of rationality over irrationality.

In contrast, the French thinkers represented by Europe did not hold much hope for rationality through reflection on the 2 World Wars, but more of the alienation and absurdity caused by the deviation of rationality to Western society. sex, and the catastrophes it brings (world wars, exploitation, colonialism, etc.). This is also the atmosphere that Camus' "The Outsider" hopes to express.

After World War II, the United States was immersed in the joy of victory, the economy grew rapidly, and the hegemony of the Western world was established. In this context, Reginald Rose, the author of the script for "Twelve Angry Men", seemed more inclined to expect a The return of the Kantian critique of reason to solve the problems caused by modernity, to correct absurdity and alienation. The subtext is that he sees this absurdity and alienation as irrational, not as a deviation from rationality. But in any case, the image of Juror No. 8 is too idealized in the real society, like the image of a Messiah who saves the darkness of modernity. Therefore, the final happy ending of this film, the final redemption, is very utopian.

"Ten" seems to begin with a continuation of existential philosophical issues, using the usual rational analysis of detective novels, emphasizing justice and human nature, but in the end it can only expect an unrealistic salvation.

View more about 12 Angry Men reviews

Extended Reading

12 Angry Men quotes

  • Juror #8: [after conducting an experiment to see if the old man could have reached his door in 15 seconds] Here's what I think happened: the old man heard the fight between the boy and his father a few hours earlier. Then, when he's lying in his bed, he heard a body hit the floor in the boy's apartment, heard the woman scream from across the street, got to his front door as fast as he could, heard somebody racing down the stairs and *assumed* it was the boy!

    Juror #6: I think that's possible!

    Juror #3: [from the other side of the room] *"Assumed"?*

    [Everyone looks at #3 as he chuckles]

    Juror #3: Brother, I've seen all kinds of dishonesty in my day, but this little display takes the cake. Y'all come in here with your hearts bleedin' all over the floor about slum kids and injustice, you listen to some fairy tales... Suddenly, you start gettin' through to some of these old ladies. Well, you're not getting through to me, I've had enough.

    [starts shouting]

    Juror #3: What's the *matter* with you guys? You all *know* he's guilty! He's *got* to burn! You're letting him slip through our fingers!

    Juror #8: [brow furrowing] "Slip through our fingers"? Are you his executioner?

    Juror #3: I'm one of 'em!

    Juror #8: ...Perhaps you'd like to pull the switch?

    Juror #3: For this kid? You bet I would!

    Juror #8: [baiting him] I feel sorry for you. What it must feel like to want to pull the switch! Ever since you walked into this room, you've been acting like a self-appointed public avenger. You want to see this boy die because you *personally* want it, not because of the facts! You're a sadist!

    [#3 lunges wildly at #8, who holds his ground. Several jurors hold #3 back]

    Juror #3: I'll kill him! I'll - *kill him!*

    Juror #8: [calmly] You don't *really* mean you'll kill me, do you?

  • Juror #8: [taking a cough drop that Juror #2 offered him] There's something else I'd like to talk about for a minute. Thanks. I think we've proved that the old man couldn't have heard the boy say "I'm gonna kill you", but supposing he did...

    Juror #10: [interrupting] You didn't prove it at all. What're you talking about?

    Juror #8: But supposing he really *did* hear it. This phrase, how many times have all of us used it? Probably thousands. "I could kill you for that, darling." "Junior, you do that once more and I'm gonna kill you." "Get in there, Rocky, and kill him!"... See, we say it every day. That doesn't mean we're gonna kill anyone.

    Juror #3: Wait a minute, what are you trying to give us here? The phrase was "I'm gonna kill you"; the kid yelled it at the top of his lungs... Don't tell me he didn't mean it! Anybody says a thing like that the way he said it, they mean it!

    Juror #2: Well, gee now, I don't know.

    [Everyone looks at #2]

    Juror #2: I remember I was arguing with the guy I work next to at the bank a couple of weeks ago. He called me an idiot, so I yelled at him.

    Juror #3: [pointing at #8] Now listen, this guy's tryin' to make you believe things that aren't so! The kid said he was gonna kill him, and he *did* kill him!

    Juror #8: Let me ask you this: do you really think the kid would shout out a thing like that so the whole neighborhood could hear him? I don't think so; he's much to bright for that.

    Juror #10: Bright? He's a common, ignorant slob. He don't even speak good English.

    Juror #11: [looking up] He *doesn't* even speak good English.