Staying up late and getting a lot of distractions.
My classmates and friends are still in a state of unlimited energy after all night,
but the author feels more and more old as he lives. nostalgic. Stubborn.
It also has the potential to go with the flow and obey the public more and more.
If it is you.
Put yourself in your shoes. What would you do.
Ask yourself, the author must first have his own opinions in his heart, and then wait for the speeches of the early birds.
Finally, the decision is based on the attitude of the public reviewers.
If,
in a life-and-death confrontation,
no one is on the same side as
you, can you hold on to it?
I suddenly thought of a sentence: Even if the whole world is against you, I still love you.
Love words are often the most beautiful and hypocritical. When you
first entered the jury room, the sultry environment gave people a reason to be restless.
At this time, people were irritable , impulsive.
I really like the setting of a plot in the movie,
that is, the names of the jurors are not given,
I hope that everyone will not be themselves,
stand in an absolutely neutral and objective attitude, and analyze the crime calmly, but the
ideal is very full, The reality is still very skinny.
Prejudice, blindness, drifting with the crowd, all kinds of emotions gather in a small room.
Many people, many people in reality, are like the jurors watching the ball,
full of confidence in their outlook on life and the world,
So I don't try to turn on the fan with the light switch when I'm half dead,
so I use my grammatically wrong native language to accuse others of not speaking their native language,
so I say contradictory words to fight back against each other.
The characters of the characters are well portrayed, and the expression of human nature is also in place.
Cowardly, sloppy, talkative, and comprehensive.
However, my personal opinion: (1) Fangda, what exactly is he defending?
He himself repeatedly said that he didn't know what happened at the time, and he was also betting on a possibility.
Maybe he was defending everyone's chance of being judged fairly,
but in my eyes, this very thorough hero image always brings A bit of a sophist's color.
(2) The final weakness of the intentional leader of the opposing side was a bit sudden.
He was able to speak hard until the end, obviously to maintain his dignity and satisfy his sense of accomplishment that he was sought after by everyone.
If it is based on his character all along, I think he should be a convincing admit defeat,
the degree of reversal of the character image is a bit exaggerated.
(3) What was the intention of the photo of his son that the leader of the opposition finally threw out?
Let's go back to the rain, and with the fans, it's like a game reversal for Juror No. 1.
The case has also been reversed, and a life is also facing the choice of fate in these hours.
Twelve jurors who had never known each other and had no grievances with the little boy made their choice, though it changed several times. But in the end they chose "reasonable doubt" and the so-called justice in their hearts.
This makes me think, can a person's strength really be overwhelming?
First, that person must be a person with excellent eloquence, a sophist-like person, and
secondly, he must have clear thinking and order, and respond to unexpected situations. responsiveness to the situation.
Due to the personality of modern people, there are fewer and fewer hard-liners.
Most of them are young people who are extremely angry, laughing, and scolding in reality, but they live in a house or indifferent.
There are people clamoring everywhere every day, how many have actually acted?
There are not too many strong opponents.
Then if you want to be a Fonda-style character, you might as well play your own "Twelve Angry Men" when you have the opportunity,
such as the next time you meet friends to chat .
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
