The first, about Fitzgeraldley's attempt to kill Glass. When Fitzgerald appeared on the stage, he was annoying, but at first I thought he was just the kind of villain with a strong sense of the market, but I didn't expect to see that he was a complete bad guy in the back. "He wants too much," Glass said of Fitzgerald when he returned to camp and decided to set off again. Fitzgerald didn't really want that much, just money. It's just that the greed for money has made him go beyond the basic goodness of human nature and the bottom line that needs to be followed. In this way, there is more desire for money. He is cruel, full of benevolence and righteousness, but when he killed the son of Glass and tried to kill Glass many times, his expression and actions did not hesitate. Watching him talk about a bunch of reasons why he abandoned Glass reminded me of a debate topic that Qi Hua said, that is, "Should Jia Ling die?" This debate involves issues of fairness and morality. I just made an assumption about the situation at the time. If Glass was accompanied by three kind-hearted companions, there were two choices. Abandoning Glass while taking care of him would allow them to survive and continue to accompany him through the snow and ice. May be defeated by cold and starvation, all dead. In these two cases, if it were you, what would you choose? It seems that the model of the tram problem seems to have no solution. Moreover, Fitzgerald's God may be the same God that many white people say—an excuse to keep them doing evil under the guise of benevolence and sanctity, self-centeredness. It's like white people who believe in God invade America.
The second one is about the invasion of America by whites, taking everything from the Indians. Industrial civilization came to the American continent for the first time, and collided with the Indians who were still nomads. This collision allowed the American continent to finally move towards civilization and progress, and there is now a powerful United States. That's a nicer way to say that, back in the movie, the cruelty is palpable. The whites were going to take their livestock, take their land, and even kidnap the daughter of an Indian chief and play with her. I am wondering a question. Civilization and progress are inseparable from friction and collision or even slaughter. However, after this victory is established, a series of rules and regulations will be formulated to ensure the order of the civilized world and cover up the blood behind it. What does it mean?
Third, the beauty and majesty presented by photographer Lubezki is unforgettable. When watching the movie, I felt that the filming location was in a high latitude area, which reminded me of Russia. Later, I checked the information and it showed that it was in Canada. "The Revenant" was filmed near Calgary, Canada, a cold place with perennial snow. The word Calgary means "clear flowing water" and is also known as the city of Calgary. The bad wind and blizzard made the plot more compact and the rhythm quickened. From the photographer's point of view, it made me feel that the actors were removed. This is a documentary of National Geographic magazine. felt through the screen.
View more about The Revenant reviews
