Unsolved Human Nature - A Q&A on the Art of Directing

Thalia 2022-04-21 09:01:15

"The Revenant", also known as "Little Plum of Survival in the Wilderness Live Streaming Eat Game Beiye, are you going to change your career? ".

As a finished film, "Desolation" is actually a bit like a documentary exploring the natural scenery. The real protagonist of the film is actually the harsh and cruel natural environment. I know this wasn't the intention of director Alejandro González Iñárritu, but it's a pity that he failed in his control of the film. It's not that he's incompetent, but that nature is too big and humans are too small. Even so, he still stands tall among the heroes, looking at the small mountains.
I appreciate such a film that expresses the evil of human nature. It brings the tyranny and cruelty of human nature to the extreme, but it is not an exaggerated and unrestrained rendering, but a "record" without emotion as much as possible. It does not regard violence and ugliness as belief. And have the courage to face the vast, small, fragile and surging heart of human beings. This film not only expresses the contradictions rooted in human genes, but also reflects the beauty of the film and the director's personal style so strong that it is so strong.

At the beginning of filming, when I heard that the crew had to temporarily move to Argentina because of the melting snow in Canada, I had a hunch that something bad might happen. The direct result of this accident was that the filming cycle of the film exceeded half a year (it seems eight months), the budget soared directly from the initial $65 million to $135 million.
The director and the photographer, Emmanuel Lubezki, probably completed this work with a lonely heart and a desire to defeat. But I felt in the director's narrative that the director had to make narrative compromises because he pursued masochistic location and natural lighting conditions. The director sacrificed the integrity and rigor of the story for this. There is a huge imbalance in the director's handling of the relationship between style and content that can't be ignored. This imbalance makes the story and the characters weak and tasteless. The characters are flat, not vivid, not three-dimensional, hollow in their hearts, and hoarse as if they want to vomit their souls, but they cannot really impress the audience. The audience "sees" the actors' dedication and hard work, but they do not understand the characters' struggle and immortal revenge. fire.
The most outstanding thing in the film is the photography, but the superb photography is suspected of overpowering the audience because of the weakness of the text.
More than 90% of the shots in "Huang" are shot with natural light in outdoor scenes, but the best shooting time per day is only about two to three hours, which also adds more uncontrollable factors, making the director want to realize his own Many of the original ideas have become extremely difficult.

It's a film that "looks" good, and that's hard to disprove, despite the tinge of gut-wrenching vibes.
"Spotlight", which beat "Huang" to win this year's Best Picture Oscar, is based on real events, like "Huang". "Focus" tells the appalling sexual assault scandal in a straight-forward and unhurried manner. It demonstrates the meaning and value of the existence of films as a socially responsible media; "Desolation" is a Western film A personal legend, emphasizing that the result of the protagonist's personal adventure is that it is easy to cause the narrative to be top-heavy and create a sense of distance from the audience. After watching the movie, the audience knows the whole story, but that's all. A film that cannot enter the hearts of the audience will be difficult to be recognized by the audience. "Huang" perfectly expresses the beauty of "craftsmanship" of film as an independent art category. Only such works can convince the audience that film is not poetry, painting, sculpture, music, or a vassal of any other art form. , a movie is a movie, and a movie is immortal.

Looking at the whole article, some paragraphs are too real if they are implemented, and too fake if they are false. What is too real is the survival of the protagonist. It doesn't have to be so specific, and it doesn't have to be so long. Let the audience stare at the character's miserable image for a long time, so that the audience will think that this is a clumsy trick to try to win sympathy, without revealing talent. Intriguing. "Empathy" is necessary, "sympathy" is optional. If you want the audience's sympathy, it is better to cut open the character's skin and let them have a glimpse of the character's heart. What's too false is the retrospect of the character's history and the pursuit of his lover. Glass's lover is actually a more important spiritual power than his son in the film, but the director always avoids the important in flashbacks, but he doesn't see the result after narrating it. With the support of revenge, can Fitzgerald hold up Glass' anger? Anger has no value if it loses its foundation.

"Huang" has the same detail as the director's previous work "Birdman", that is, the meteorite that fell from the sky. In "Birdman", the meteorite corresponds to the tragic figure "Icarus" in Greek mythology, which is a metaphor for Riggan's idealistic feelings of the protagonist who is willing to sacrifice his life for the realization of self-worth. In this film, the meteorite corresponds to the natives of North America. The demise of Indian civilization, this kind of decline is irreversible like a meteorite falling from the sky, because the wheel of history is rolling forward and will not sympathize with any broken ant under the wheel.
The essence of the film story is the collision of values, and telling the loss of values ​​is one of the most important themes of the film.

In the wilderness, in the forbidden zone of civilization, survival is everything; everyone is a hunter and a prey at the same time.
Primitive, savage, tyrannical, icy, fierce, the savage aura of eating alive and drinking blood is the most vital part of this film, but it is a pity that it is displayed in a slightly chaotic and tedious manner.
Most of these movies about revenge and trying to explain human nature can be summed up as a sentence in the Book of Rites: "Love and know its evil, hate and know its good." We should face up to our wildness, not escaping, not condoning ; Understand that it is the force that supports our survival and reproduction, and believe that it is the eternal cornerstone of life. People are walking on the road of building civilization, but we cannot forget that civilization requires us to pause from time to time to examine ourselves.




As an actor, Leonardo DiCaprio has so far won Oscar nominations, including one best supporting actor and four best actor, and winning is an award, not giving it is the norm. Leonardo has been favored too much, and this "injustice" is nothing at all, let alone compared with Roger Deakins, the master photographer who has won more than ten nominations but never won. This time Leonardo is holding the statue not by credit, but by hard work and the general weakness of his competitors; his performance this time is far from his best acting. In this film, he uses hysterical neurotic performance to deduce what is "tragic", but he cannot make the audience feel the same. When the audience begins to doubt the authenticity of the character, the character and the actor are already half-failed.
Leonardo is too fond of playing "abnormal humans", perhaps unintentionally, but he has successfully carried forward the masochistic style of performance. He loves roles and performances with strong emotions and exaggerated bodies. It cannot be said that it is not good in general, but too many external performances are not conducive to the improvement of actors' acting skills, and they are inferior. He lacks the skills to grasp the role of a calm but turbulent character on the outside, and he doesn't seem to know how to express complex and intense emotions and states with restrained and subtle performances; from this perspective, Tom, who is a green leaf for him Hardy seems to be well versed in it. If he doesn't consider the role positioning, Tang Laoshi is much more sophisticated than Xiao Lizi this time.

View more about The Revenant reviews

Extended Reading
  • Briana 2021-10-20 18:59:40

    A movie that the entire crew suffers a lot. The harsh natural environment is the protagonist of this movie. The natural light photography and slow narrative rhythm are also trying to amplify the environment. The wild revenge logic of the western film makes the revenge itself change. It has to be simple and rude. The ten-sequence plays do not rush or slow down, and there are no amazing parts. The genre-based editing rhythm is expected, the best photographer Roger Diggins next year! ★★★

  • Milton 2022-03-25 09:01:05

    The white hunter fell in love with the aboriginal girl, but was trampled by the barbaric alien civilization, so he embarked on the road of revenge (Yes, this story is so familiar, Hollywood...). There are some iconic Inaritu’s human-ghost dialogue and the soul floats, but it seems that some of the things that I liked very much have also been lost, and they have become very beautiful, very college... Xiao Li can be directly renamed Xiaoqiang, and he is torn by the bear. It’s not easy to kick and step

The Revenant quotes

  • Placard (in french): WE ARE ALL SAVAGES

  • John Fitzgerald: You all right there kid? Your head in the right place?

    Bridger: I guess... I can't help thinking about whether we did the right...

    John Fitzgerald: No! Ain't our place to wonder. The good Lord got us on a road whether we choose it or not.

    John Fitzgerald: My pop, he weren't a religious man, you know? If you couldn't grow it, kill it, or eat it, he just plain old didn't believe in it, that was it. And this one time he head on up the old Saba hills... San Saba hills? He joined a couple Texas Ranger buddies of his to hunt you know? pretty routine, he done it like a hundred times before, should have been a three-day kill but, on the second day, it all went fucked. Somehow that night he lost his buddies, and to top it off, them Comanches went and took the horses so, he was starving and delirious... and he crawls up into this mott, this... this group of trees out in the middle of nowhere just sticking up in this ocean of scrub and he found religion. At that moment he told me... he found God. And it turns out that God... He's a squirrel. Yea. A big, old meaty one. "I found God" he used to say. "And while sitting there and basking in the glory and sublimity of mercy... I shot and ate that son of a bitch".

    John Fitzgerald: Yeah. You might want to close your eyes kid.