Procedural Justice and Consequential Justice

The role of Team Rice in the Marvel series of movies is unique. Every time a new series begins, Team Rice is the lead, and I feel that some of the contents of Team Rice’s response are also in-depth.
The plot is basically clear. The evil forces infiltrated into state institutions and used public resources to build war machines. Under the guise of defending the country, the actual purpose is to eliminate hostile elements and open the way for the establishment of a new international order. Team good friends to do things together. Whether it is bearable or unbearable, Team Rice sees into its conspiracy, and then stands up to save the world and friends, and finally achieve a great success.
Since it is a 2014 movie, it is not surprising that the hottest element of 2014 - big data - appeared.
After watching the film, you know the villain's plan: it aims to use a set of algorithms to predict what it may do by collecting and analyzing the target's daily behavior. If it is not good for the country, it will be eliminated. The taste of the future. This algorithm seems to be difficult to implement, but if you think about it, it is not impossible. Baidu's guess you like it, Amazon's recommendation algorithm, and even the entry memory in the Sogou input method, you can see the shadow of the Nazi scientist's algorithm in the film.
After watching the film, the villain's purpose is clear, and it is actually paving the way for a cult analog to establish a new world order. However, if you think a little deeper, what if he really contributes to the country and mankind? What if his purpose is righteous? If human technology is really powerful enough to find future terrorists through data analysis, can it be done first? Going a little deeper, is it justified to collect personal data on a large scale in order to prevent possible crime? After 9/11, the United States established a database of terrorists to prevent terrorism by analyzing the faces of people who entered the United States through various channels; Snowden's classmates broke the NSA's large-scale surveillance, censorship, interception and analysis of keywords for anti-terrorism activities. Is it reasonable?
In fact, what this involves is nothing more than individual interests and collective interests, procedural justice and purpose justice.
——————————————
I only need to sacrifice 20 million people to establish a new order for 7 billion people.
by "Meet Team 2" villain boss
——————————————
I think this line is designed by the screenwriter to expose the real purpose of the villain (to rule the world for cult analogues), then if we change it:
————————
I only need to sacrifice 20 million people, Bring peace and security to seven billion people.
——————
So is this business worth doing?
This is so scary, 20 million people will die anyway! ! ! This kind of thing is tantamount to the Holocaust and genocide, how can such a thing be done?
Is it not?
The famous superhero movie "Watchmen" ended like this. Tens of millions of people in several major cities died, but the world was at peace. The United States and the Soviet Union stopped fighting for hegemony and building nuclear weapons. And the doctor who was used as a tool finally thought this was acceptable.



Does it exist in reality? There are also sticky ones.
I remember that it was said in the family planning propaganda that through family planning, 20 million fewer people were born in our country in a certain period of time (forgot the specific time). Likewise, 20 million people.
Of course, this is less childbirth, which is very different from murder, but how different is it from forced abortion after a few months of pregnancy? As for how many cases of forced abortions caused by the basic national policy, and how horrible it is, you can probably understand something by reading "Frog".
Is it okay to have no family planning? I believe that when formulating this policy, the people in the central bureau must be beneficial, at least the country. Well, no:
————————
As many people as I can forcefully induce labor, I can bring about a better life for the majority of the rest.
——————
It’s quite similar.
Sacrifice an individual or a small group for the benefit of the majority. For the purpose of justice or usefulness, means can be by any means necessary.
China seems to have always said that, for some Western countries, they may attach more importance to personal interests and may attach more importance to procedural justice.
-----------------------Boundary -------------------
"Mi Team 2" Story It's pretty good, and it has connotations worth thinking about (Let me complain about , that's a hahaha), and the issues it discusses, in the Internet age, we are also discussing.
As for the pure film aspect, the director also did a great job, the whole film is compact, without pissing points, and the story is attractive. As far as the imagination is too exaggerated and the plot unreasonable (for such a big thing, what about the brothers in Team Rice??? lying at home and resting???) Anyway, most of the superhero movies are like this, and that's it.

View more about Captain America: The Winter Soldier reviews