the golden city is hidden in high places, and it is very prosperous and evil.
The Silmarillion hangs on the throne, and the shadows slowly come.
The wind is blowing and the fire is rolling, and the country is in a foreign land.
Smaug, the evil dragon, dominates the kingdom of dwarves.
After fighting the fierce orcs again, the father died and the father separated.
The stubborn chieftain with a broken arm retreats, and the tragically victorious clan withers.
Speaking of Bilbo, leisurely smoking a pipe.
Spew small clouds and lead to big adventures.
The gray-robed old man visited, and the farmer came to the party.
Laughing, singing, dancing, eating, and playing around.
The warriors chanted and set off to the unknown.
Intense inner fighting, and finally chasing the big army.
Fourteen masters went to the far-flung mountain together.
How hard it is to go here, I have brought it with one stroke.
It's not a spoiler, so don't blame yourself.
The giant monster wants to barbecue, and it turns into a stubborn stone overnight.
Brown old mage, save the hedgehog from the giant spider.
Rabbits come to drive, and the abandoned city meets the dead.
The magic mountain is a corner, and it will come out sixty years later.
The half-beasts pursued closely, borrowing the path of the elf.
In the rainy night, the giants fight, the ground sinks and the whole army is overwhelmed.
Half-man falls into the abyss, Gollum.
The guessing baby is lost, and the Lord of the Rings is beginning to appear.
The underground palace chased and was surrounded by stubborn chiefs.
The giant eagle came to rescue, and Gu Shan floated in front of him.
Forty-eight frame rate, rich and smooth,
magnificent epic volume, how strong the travel.
This book will be concluded first, and the officials will play it for themselves.
If you want to know what happens next, you must first pass the doomsday.
I had doubts about whether The Hobbit could be made well enough. A good movie first needs a good script. The Lord of the Rings trilogy first depends on the Lord of the Rings masterpiece, while the Hobbit is based on only a thin volume of novels.
Literally, The Hobbit is definitely a notch worse than The Lord of the Rings. The style of writing is also lighthearted and humorous, and the cruel scenes are overshadowed, and the text is relatively concise and the details are not much inked.
It's really disconcerting to have another trilogy in a book like this, and the
first is about a third of the size of the book. But how to arrange the second and third?
According to the meaning of the movie, the third part may also tell the story
of the next sixty years beyond the novel. Let’s record it here. Let’s see how the movie depicts the
guest bear, the spider siege, and the escape by barrel. , Bilbo teases the dragon, Bard shoots the dragon, and the battle of the five armies. The plot of these main nodes
can be seen from the first movie and the gap between the first movie of The Lord of the Rings, which is also the gap between the novel and the
novel. The main disadvantage: the characterization of the
supporting characters is vague
in the novel. In order to make up a 13 doom number and then introduce Bilbo as 14 people, I got 12 dwarves at once. In the novel, except for Thorin who is the head, Balin is the deputy head and scout, and the Kili brothers are the most. Active, Bombur is the laziest, and everyone else is a faceless crowd.
Compared to the diversity of the Fellowship of the Ring team composition and the diversity of characters, the crowd dwarves are really blurry. The movie is even more so, it is impossible to have so many shots for so many dwarves. That is to say, Dwarin was regarded as the most fierce one and showed a little more face. The other
main characters, like the novels, were not good enough to express
Bilbo . Thorin and Gandalf must be the core of the positive characters.
1 Gandalf is still a character who turns and disappears at any time, strictly speaking, he is not the protagonist.
2 Does Thorin want to show the complexity of human nature or be a hero?
Thorin was suspicious of Bilbo in the early stages of the novel. After passing the wood elf level, he believed that Bilbo was indispensable, but he became angry when he learned that the Silmaril was given away by Bilbo. Bury the hatchet. In addition, the other dwarves have only limited expression of the old style (in the film, the role of the old gay is played by Bahrain), and what he did after taking the treasure was really disgusting.
Thorin is actually a typical dwarf image, that is, short-sighted (determined by the height of the dwarves and craftsmanship tradition), stubborn (the opposite of the dwarf's perseverance), and vindictive (the opposite of clear love and hate), the desire for treasure exceeds everything, it is difficult to imagine Restoring the homeland of the dwarves has a higher weight in this adventure and regaining its wealth.
However, the expression in the film is to fully express the complexity of human nature (this is one of the advantages of Tolkien's writing over ordinary fantasy popular novels). The audience does not like it, and Bilbo cannot meet the needs from appearance to temperament. The screen image of a big hero, (no matter how delusional the hero image is, people's emotions need it, no one doesn't love handsome guys and beautiful women) This burden seems to be left to Sorin. In The Lord of the Rings, this handsome and handsome hero image is handed over to Aragorn.
Just like Aragorn in The Lord of the Rings should be in his 80s according to the actual age of the novel, Thorin is also very old according to the novel, and the movie can only make them younger.
Frodo, the actual protagonist of The Lord of the Rings, is my favorite character, and the movie inherits the depiction of the novel. It's a vivid little character who turns into a big thing, but I still find that many audiences still think Frodo Boring, cowardly, incompetent, in a critical moment, he will only use the protagonist's halo to call on Sam, Gandalf, Aragorn and other meat shields.
The Lord of the Rings is a commercial giant, not a literary niche. If the movie only had Frodo as the main character, many viewers would not buy it. Fortunately, The Lord of the Rings is huge, and the major branches are alternately switched, so the audience will not be boring to Frodo, who is only ascetic all the way. Characters like Aragorn are even more laid out than Frodo.
However, there is no such tall and complete image of Aragorn in The Hobbit novels. Thorin's advantages are not obvious, but there are a lot of disadvantages. The other dwarves are unrecognizable, Gandalf disappears halfway, and Bilbo is always a little outsider. It's not easy to adapt a movie. It's hard to do in The Lord of the Rings if you look at Frodo if you want to see human nature, in-depth understanding of the mood of small people, and if you want to look at handsome guys and big heroes, you should look at Aragonese Galegolas.
The first song is compared to the part of the novel. At this time, Sorin's face is not clear, and he has not given the opportunity to speak a few times in the book, so the movie only emphasizes his tough guy, vengeful, a little reckless and a little judging by appearances. . According to such a trend, Thorin is likely to be a hero or a tragic hero throughout the book, and only occasionally make small mistakes. In that case, I don't know how the movie will help Sorin's need for money and life (the army of human elves is under the city, and there are only 12 dwarves in total to defend the enemy and dare to do nothing) and the depth of scheming (steady human and elves) Starry night sent a letter to let Dan lead his army to come here).
3 The first protagonist is an outsider.
Frodo was involved in the Lord of the Rings for no reason, and finally stepped forward and carried the Lord of the Rings to become the protagonist who was most deeply involved in the main narrative (only he can carry the Lord of the Rings, and the story cannot be advanced without the Lord of the Rings. His own end is the end of the whole story).
And Bilbo has nothing to worry about. He was persuaded by Gandalf in the early stage. What moved him was only the adventure itself, not one-fourteenth of the wealth. Bilbo, who had the Lord of the Rings at the end of the first book, had the detachment of an outsider spectator. In other words, the presence or absence of Bilbo in the novel does not affect the progression of the narrative, but only affects the outcome (nothing but the bad end of the dwarves).
After that, Bilbo relied on the Lord of the Rings to advance and retreat in the main plots such as the spider siege and the escape on a barrel. In the most dangerous and climax of the Battle of the Five Armies, he was knocked unconscious and lay aside. It was not him but Bud who killed Brother Simao, the biggest enemy.
Moreover, Bilbo's own ability is much stronger than Frodo, who has no fighting skills, whether it is mental (tearing dragons) or fighting (fighting spiders), and of course, the most powerful plug-in The invisibility of the Lord of the Rings (so Lun's ability has not recovered to the level of controlling the Lord of the Rings at this time)
Therefore, Bilbo in the novel does not even need the protagonist's halo. Basically, he saves others instead of others. He acts as Gandalf in the Lord of the Rings.
He became a bystander to the storytelling.
An outsider spectator with a dissociated temperament cannot be an engaging movie protagonist. Bilbo in the first movie is nothing, but after that, Bilbo who uses the Lord of the Rings at any time keeps appearing. One, if you can avoid the catastrophe, what else can you do?
Personally, I think the movie should weaken Bilbo, let him only use his wits, add all the martial aspects to Thorin, and balance it a little, so that the audience can watch it comfortably.
The main advantage of improving the novel: the introduction of the
original novel of the brown-robed mage is just to mention the brown-robed mage by other people's words, and the movie is very rich here, as if the old man became the first supporting role in the first book. In fact, there should be no one who will not like this bird's nest on the head, the nature and animal guardian of the driving rabbit.
The Lord of the Rings has been improved . In the
novel, Bilbo just picked it up as soon as he fell into the abyss. This is unconvincing. How could Gollum not know that he lost something that he regarded as life? Losing this reasonable Asog that Bilbo picked up became
the nemesis of the Thorin clan The
boss is also
ok. This is the new hatred and the old hatred. The problem is that Asog didn't die at the end of the first part. . .
Sorin was going to die heroically in the end. Could it be that Sorin was also killed by Asog? Emotionally unacceptable
, some of Asog's son Berg didn't know how to interact
. . .
The following small problems were solved by watching the movie and then checking the information. Finally, I thought about it and solved it.
1. Gandalf's intention problem.
As a Maya with such a high status, why did Gandalf willingly participate in the unrelated dwarf adventure?
I felt later. Gandalf is actually a mixture of Jiang Ziya and Shen Gongbao.
Just like Fengshenbang, he will also send a lot of people to the palace of Mandos.
Of course, his goal is to destroy the necromancer. Participating in dwarf adventures under the big goal mainly lies in Use the power of dwarves to destroy the evil forces that may become Sauron's allies, that is, the evil dragon Simao, although this dragon has a normal relationship with Sauron, but if darkness engulfs it, of course, it will also make waves. After Simao, there will be no dragons in Middle Earth. . .
2,12 The end of the dwarves
Half of the dwarves have a bad ending.
Sorin:
Fili and Kili: died in battle. The funniest pair died in battle. It is unacceptable
. Orc shot dead According to the novel he was the only one who visited Bilbo (other dwarves are too boring)
There is a mention of his tomb in The Lord of the Rings
Ori: The last dwarf to be killed in Moria, dead Before leaving a record, the Fellowship of the Ring watched this record
Ou Yin: The only one who escaped from Moria, but was caught by the Water Watcher outside the West Gate must be dead, and the Water Watcher also appeared in the Lord of the Rings Others didn't seem to have lived the longest in the
end, Dwarin lived 340 years old and died.
View more about The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey reviews
