How to train a dragon, how to make a toy

"How to Train Your Dragon" has a very good reputation after its release. After watching it, I think it has the potential to win awards. Many people have even shouted that they have reserved the best, but some people have pointed out that they have to watch "Toys 3" before talking about it. For me, I've watched a lot of pixar's, but I haven't seen the toy series, plus I was a little disappointed with last year's "Flying House", and I doubted whether "Toys 3" is so good. . . . . But after watching the show at 0:00 tonight (Beijing Wanda cbd dual-machine 3D, imax is basically in Mandarin, I didn't watch it), I had to accept it. The most important feeling is that pixar's creativity is too rich and powerful, and indeed "How to Train Your Dragon" won the award Still hanging. . . . Of course, the two films still have their own advantages. "Toys 3" has more elements and more literary drama, while "How to Train Your Dragon" is simpler and more focused, with more sense of movement, especially the flying experience is unparalleled.

An impeccable masterpiece

. First of all, I know from what I said before. I haven't watched 1 and 2, and it basically does not affect the viewing of 3. The audience can easily understand the background framework and the origin of the old characters at the beginning. Start to enter with the plot of 3. New environments, new stories.

The rhythm of the whole film is well arranged, and there is no time for procrastination. The fun is constant, the small climaxes one after another, but there is a degree of relaxation, and there are always mild episodes. The ending was even more successful (as seen by other comments). Unlike "Flying House", all the excitement is in the opening, which makes people feel anticlimactic.

There are many ways to be humorous, such as dialogue, but for animation, of course, the most important thing is to express through action images. 3 is also very good in this regard. Impressive ones, such as potato execution and Bass dance, are the highlights of the combination of creative talent and superb skills. The characters of many toy characters are well portrayed and full of creativity, which is mainly reflected by their respective characteristic movements. But multiple roles will not make people feel confused and confused about who is stealing who plays. In contrast, the handling of non-protagonists in "How to Train Your Dragon" is much simpler.

In terms of plot story, it doesn't feel like a children's film, and I am very satisfied. As for the scene design, visual effects, etc., there is no need to say much about the pixar sign. . .

The 3D effect is basically the same as How to Train Your Dragon. Great sense of space. It is estimated that the three-dimensional shooting animation of this kind of original 3D is at this level.

Even if the film has to pick out some shortcomings, it will definitely not affect the film's value for money.

The best animation award is estimated to have no suspense again. . . Unless it's a shock for the sake of a shock. .

PS: Has anyone seen the pixar short film at the beginning? Anyway, I don't see it, I strongly despise it, China loves castrated goods.

PSS: At 0:00, there were not many people, but after watching it, there was a lot of applause. It is estimated that many of them are fans of the toy series.

PPPS: At the end of the credits, the Chinese subtitle "Going through the back door" is too evil.

PSSSS: Taobao is in the Chinese subtitles of ebay, which is really localized. . .

View more about Toy Story 3 reviews