I don't know why such a classic movie was delayed until today for the first time. If a literary film is commercially successful, it will make people very gratified; relatively speaking, if a theme that is bound to be successful in business is surprisingly literary, it will make people very pleasantly surprised. This movie is probably the latter. I thought it was a theme park-like movie, but there are actually a lot of very artistic treatments. Spielberg is not only a visual event, but also a master of narration. It is very good to make this movie a visual effect and a sci-fi story. combination.
Of course, the original script/book is very solid, and it clearly explains how to bring dinosaurs back to life from a sci-fi point of view, rather than letting the audience watch and complain about the falsehood of the story. Several characters have depth, realism, arch, and reasons for their existence in the story. The acting skills of children do not pull their hips. Spielberg is really good at discovering and scheduling young actors. Not to mention the visual effects, the CGI of 1993 doesn't seem to have much sense of age now, and the props are also very detailed. There is also classic theme music, which is an indispensable element of dream-making.
The only thing I want to complain about is that the dinosaurs on a rainy day won't be so anxious to chase people away, not to mention that they are full and full every day. They should not want to eat people so much. It feels like opening the door, chasing people, and consumption. Physical strength is much more than eating a child.
View more about Jurassic Park reviews
