had a dream place to go;
they were all spaceships, and the ships had to be tilted to make the scene look exciting;
the ships had to have air outlets, and the protagonists had to be tested in the wind tunnel. There
are steering wheels on board, and bad helmsman, to grab the rudder; the
protagonist must use jet equipment to fly in the air;
there must be a supporting role on the ship, wall-e is a robot and a human, and up is a bunch of stupid dogs;
Be sure to let the protagonists fight or take part in the extravehicular;
the protagonists must reach the target from the unorthodox way of the ship, wall-e and eva pass through the garbage cleaning pipe, and up has a similar plot;
there must be rescued objects , wall-e is a plant, up is a big bird, and they all try to use the rescued object to elevate the idea of the movie;
such details are too numerous to mention, but wall-e feels that it is not just a simple cartoon, it is completely worth loading. In the annals of history, up can only show the bad habit of Hollywood people who love to fry cold rice and continue mink. For the
specific reasons, see
Ma Renren, a famous fashion director in Wuhan
. | (category: default category)
I watched "Flying House Travels" for the first time today. To be honest, I was a little disappointed, even if I saw the trailer before, I had expected that this annual animation would not be very exciting. Anticlimactic, make do with it.
The following text contains spoilers, read with caution.
I always have a preference for cartoons, because I can put down all psychological defenses and offensive weapons, and watch stories that are far away and close to life like a child. In the movie theater, no one knows how old you are. Between a group of children and a group of parents, you can silently tell yourself that you are still young.
Personally give this movie 78 points, which is higher than 75 and lower than 80. It's a good production in this summer's file, better than the two and a half hours of "Transformers" and "Harry Potter". The plot is very Hollywood tempo, 90 minutes of movie, 20 minutes of warm and small climax, 30 minutes of small depression, 40 minutes of villain appearance, 50 minutes of villain boss coming out, 60 minutes of big climax (chasing scene), 70 minutes of turning point and understanding, The villain was defeated in 80 minutes, and the final ending echoed the previous auxiliary emotional clue. The most outrageous thing is that this time the rescue scene is through the air vent again!
The first half hour of "Flying House" kept my emotions in a very excited state. The opening takes a few minutes to briefly describe the life story of a pair of lovers, with tight rhythm and accurate soundtrack. The narrative is concise, the lines are few, and the story is explained without delay, but the mood has always been slow, with a little nostalgic sadness (in fact, I really hate using words like sadness now, but the love between two old people for decades The story still makes me unable to avoid this feeling). This beginning belongs to the super five-star level, but the movie did not maintain this level. I thought it was "walle" from 2009, but the more I watched it, the more disappointed I became.
Grandpa's self-made "elevator" and some renovations he made to turn the small house into a "flying house" still brought a little surprise. It's just that this kind of surprise has only come a couple of times. I feel that an "otaku" who has been dreaming for decades should have more wisdom hidden in his home. Moreover, as a cartoon, it has already made the balloon fly thousands of kilometers with the house. Why can't there be a little more exaggerated cleverness in the details? The physical logic is very confusing. Compared with last year's "Walle", which happened in the future space, it can be logically justified. This movie really has many logical loopholes.
The little fat male protagonist, looks very annoying to me, and the Mandarin dubbing makes him neither simple nor clever, just a stupid chatter. The role in the plot is also very loose. A character who has been on the scene for more than an hour does not even feel his role in this play. Basically it's a way to win over kids.
The villain is too ugly. The big boss on the other side is a adored adventurer, who seems to be a little obsessed in his later years. His army is a pack of vicious dogs with bad faces. The origin between good and evil is not strong enough, and there is no part of psychological struggle. Simply put, it is too simple.
The audience positioning is ambiguous, highlighting the commercial intentions, and the sincerity is not enough. The film has some very boring front and back confrontations, as well as some mentally retarded jokes, obviously coaxing children. In many links, very obscure pictures and language are used to convey information. The most obvious is the infertility of the grandfather's wife and the divorce of the child's parents. These two plots are the key to promoting the plot. It is inexplicable that they are so diluted.
What I want to say is that whether it is 3D or 4D, animation should first mature the script.
View more about Up reviews
