Marlin has always been careful about the safety of his son Nemo because of the loss of his beloved wife. But the child craved freedom after all, and this disagreement indirectly led to Nemo's capture. In this case, Marlin could only desperately look for his son regardless of his old life. In the end, I got a happy ending, and I will no longer interfere with my son's freedom. Everyone is happy.
However, the premise is that Marlin is also a near-death along the way, almost becoming the belly of sharks and jellyfish. But in the end, he turned his luck into danger and found his son safely. In the end, I understood that we are the protagonists of the cartoon, and we are invulnerable to Brother Chun. So, rest assured to let my son fly. We can understand the director, but in reality, can we use this to guide our behavior?
Why did the Declaration of Independence put the right to life before the right to liberty? In my understanding, Jefferson also felt that life was more important. Sacrifice your life for freedom and happiness, and that's because that's the freedom and happiness of a lot of people. My own words, if the life is gone, how can the freedom and happiness come from?
So, Marlin's approach is actually not wrong. The sea is indeed unsafe, and it is right to be cautious. What is wrong is that he should not have imposed this on his son. The more it is imposed, the deeper the contradiction, and the more the son will go in the opposite direction. And I believe that after Nemo caught him this time, he won't touch the bottom of the cruise ship next time he is killed. Some detours are to be taken. Although life is more important, it is true. But without being beaten, you won't understand this. In a harmonious society, life is more expensive. There are some dangers that should be faced or faced. scale? Take care of yourself, this is the right way.
View more about Finding Nemo reviews
