The whole movie is particularly forceful and deliberate to strengthen the unfortunate clown, even when he went to the hospital to perform a show for children, he fell out of the gun and lied to the boss that it was a prop, and it was also his misfortune that he was fired? Is it reasonable to go to other people's sons to disturb other people's lives without knowing the facts? Looking at his boss from another angle, how lucky is a philanthropist? Does the movie have any descriptions of other characters besides the cruelty of forcibly selling the clown? And is the clown good as a clown? The jokes he told were not funny, and he blamed others for not paying? Because of his own misfortune, he should hate the rich and hurt others. Is it cool to do so? The information conveyed is terrifying.
Regarding some people saying that this is populism, shouldn't such an unrepresentative protagonist be found to oppose the elite and the authority? Find such a special character and try to use his mental illness to reinforce his misfortune and rationalize the fact that he kills people. Do civilians have mental illnesses? Both respect violence and murder? In the film, the host invited the clown to the stage because of his mental illness, so why didn't the film itself use mental illness to grab attention?
Movies that want to reflect similar social issues have very deep descriptions of parasites, and the characters are very representative. It is also a movie. I suggest you not to watch the clown and waste your time.
View more about Joker reviews