boom and bust

Eddie 2022-04-19 09:01:01

In the analysis of the Godfather Trilogy, there is a chapter called "Major Character Analysis" in which some comparisons are made between the two Godfathers. I feel that some of these comparisons are a little superficial, so the following is a comparison of the two generations of godfathers Vito and Michael from my personal point of view. I always think that the difference between Vito and Michael on the surface can never be analyzed only from the difference in the characters of the two people. I prefer to analyze the way of doing things of the two people from the era and experience they live in. In terms of career, a significant difference between the two is that Vito is easy to grasp the role of the godfather, while Michael has been making outstanding achievements, but it always seems very difficult; another significant difference is that Vito's role in The family is holding up pretty well, while Michael is far worse. For both of these things, the authors of The Godfather Trilogy Analysis tend to explain that Vito himself is a very enthusiastic person, while Michael is cold-blooded. However, such an analysis is simple, because one of the obvious things is that Michael's personality is different before and after becoming a new generation of godfather, that is to say, many of Michael's personalities are gradually formed after becoming a godfather. There are three reasons why Vito grasps this role with ease: experience, interest, and historical background. Vito went from a poor boy with nothing to the throne of the godfather step by step. From childhood to adulthood, he has dealt with all kinds of people from all walks of life, including his close friends like brothers and his opponents. He also had the closest contact with two gangsters with different styles (both Italian style and American style) and suffered by them. So from experience, Vito knows very well how to become a gangster who is feared by his enemies, trusted by his godchildren, and loved by his relatives. And did Michael have such an experience? Too bad. As the third eldest and not interested in the gangster business, he may have never thought of inheriting his father's industry since he was a child. He wants to live like an average American, he has an American name, he has an American sense of honor (in the Navy), and he finds 100% American women as girlfriends. . . So Santino's death, Fredo's incompetence brought the position of Godfather too suddenly for Michael, how can we expect such an inexperienced person to be able to make Godfather like his father in a short period of time handy? Vito has helped people with such trivial matters as rent. What about Michael?

View more about The Godfather: Part II reviews

Extended Reading
  • Alisha 2022-03-21 09:01:02

    "The Godfather 1" is the greatest gangster movie, and "The Godfather 2" is the second greatest gangster movie.

  • Allan 2022-04-24 07:01:01

    With how the crime family mansion was built in the 1920s, compared to how the family fell apart in 1958-59, the growth and family themes seem far-reaching, and big scenes such as the Cuban Revolution also shocked the audience. The little godfather is extremely hilarious at heights, and if the audience does not have the prerequisite knowledge of the first episode, they will not be able to get on the line... At the end of the film, it is very good to return to the "prequel" and the happy time point. I admit its artistic value, But really can't like it.

The Godfather: Part II quotes

  • Michael Corleone: Fredo, you're nothing to me now. You're not a brother, you're not a friend. I don't want to know you or what you do. I don't want to see you at the hotels, I don't want you near my house. When you see our mother, I want to know a day in advance, so I won't be there. You understand?

  • [Ordering drinks in a Havana cafe]

    Fredo Corleone: Uno... por favor...

    [to Michael]

    Fredo Corleone: How do you say "banana daiquiri"?

    Michael Corleone: "Banana daiquiri."