Hitchcock said: "For me, the cinema is not a slice of life, bit a piece of cake." Cinema is not life, but it is higher than life, because life must be a mixture of ups and downs, and she doesn't need it complex.
Is a three hour movie long? This kind of problem is between different viewing experiences, and Lao Ma tried to maximize this sense of time with "elegant and popular", of course, only for some viewers. Common: foul language, nudity, sex, drugs, money-first values. Ya: unified style, pleasant music, rich emotions, blurred images. Through the ups and downs of the role of Jorden Belfort, we have seen all the sensual dogs and horses under the bright and beautiful suits of Wall Street. It is worth mentioning that his fortune and fall did not take up a lot of time. The whole article is almost all about the daily life of this materialistic circle, plus some conflicting plots about his family life. It can be said that there is no urine point in the whole process. He could have been sentenced to 20 years for such serious money laundering, but after three years of carelessness, he is still living well, promoting his own success, is the movie guiding a wrong value orientation? He just laundered money, it was just an economic crime, and the victims, whether they were capitalists or made poor, seemed to be nothing. Of course, it cannot be ruled out that this real prototype may have committed other crimes in reality, or that he forced others to break down. I still feel that it is indeed conveying a value, whether it is right or wrong, but it is the epitome of reality. His successful study, how ordinary people sell products, the drug dealer seems to be shaking, it turns out that what the teacher taught us is wrong, and liars are the best teachers.
View more about The Wolf of Wall Street reviews
