The film is set in the United States during the slave period and presents a variety of characters. There were bounty hunters who sneered at slavery, white slave owners who regarded black lives as rubbish, and old black slaves who looked down on other blacks when they were senior. But Quentin obviously doesn't want to discuss and dissect slavery, he just uses that era as a background, because there is a slow and elegant charm of that era, and the hero seems to be more heroic as a person who challenges slavery.
But Django doesn't want to challenge the whole system, he just wants to get his love back. People stop killing people, and Buddhas stop killing Buddhas. If the system blocks him, then it’s better to destroy the system. It happened that he was a natural killer, and he met a good master again, so the liberated Django unleashed infinite power, and had a crazy and exciting bloody revenge.
It is a pity that the two talkers in the film died prematurely and did not catch up with the final climax. The estate owner Candy and Dr. Schultz both died of their own pride. One had to attack the opponent's dignity after gaining the upper hand, but the other's last dignity was not allowed to be attacked, and both died. Of course, they didn't die in vain, and their deaths pushed Django directly into a showdown with the entire estate (or rather the entire system).
In the end, Django leaves with his lover, perhaps continuing to be a bounty hunter, or perhaps seclusion. But his legend is bound to spread among blacks and eventually become a force to be reckoned with.
View more about Django Unchained reviews
