I really can't remember the names of people, and the big name effect is really weak to me (the only one who remembers the name is Nicolas Cage of "National Treasure"), but the impression of the style is still very deep. Someone mentioned "Deadly" "Magic" was made by Nolan. I think the style and plot arrangement of the film are very good. To say that this "Interstellar" was made by the same person can only explain that nothing can be maintained consistently. In a good place, you can look at other movie reviews. I just take it as a way to express my personal emotions:
1. Many scenes were shot in real locations. I can only say that I admire this spirit. It can be photographed on the Internet, but it may be more cost-effective and trouble-free to make it directly with CG---slap in the face, but what is the significance of using real scenes? (I personally prefer the combination of real scenes and CG)
Second, those who say that they travel through wormholes, have you really not seen the scene when Nobita and Doraemon use the time machine in the drawer? Raemon is also surprisingly like (Doraemon is definitely not original), science fiction is to give people the experience of new ideas, I was shocked in the animation when I was a child.
3. I laughed when I heard the little girl called Murphy. It must have something to do with Murphy's law. The little girl naturally can't escape and will become an important narrative line, but she sees through the truth process, and her father's cross Dimensional communication, completing the professor's equations, there is an indescribable lack of drama
. Fourth, Doyle's death is too nonsensical (not good or bad), and when the waves come, I think of "Rescue at the Center of the Earth". The bridge section, section by section of the drill car, every section has to pretend a warrior to die~~~ The waves are rising. I told the little friend around me that the man is going to die. He asked why, because this scene must be Someone is going to die, who will watch the movie if the woman dies~~ Only the man dies, but you die with a little tear and value, okay? What are you looking at, you can't help, people have a protagonist halo, you don't even count as an onion, what are you doing standing there stupidly, (it should be that the cabin door can't be closed suddenly, you sacrifice yourself to close the door from the outside) , this bridge is not unusable, but at least it should be bloody, dead inexplicable~~
The three type labels of this movie:
Adventure: This must not be a wonderful adventure,
science fiction: Some people may say that science is like this sometimes, some people laugh at those who give low scores and say they can't understand the theory of relativity. First of all, the theory of relativity is not so good, otherwise Einstein would not be because of The photoelectric effect won the Nobel Prize; science fiction should give people a new concept experience, the doomsday theme, nothing special (there are comments and complaints, you tm go to other planets, it seems that you have food to eat, a kind of elementary organic matter How much better the world can be than our Beijingized Earth)
Suspense: Haha
, some people will say that this is a non-genre film, a non-traditional popcorn movie, I thought of the movie "Cloud Atlas" again, and there was a lot of applause, although I think That time was well spent, but it definitely wasn't such a touted movie.
The human nature is portrayed, but it can only be said that it is worse. I can understand Mann's anti-water, but you are acting a little strange, a little abrupt, but the black uncle's dormancy is no longer dormant. I think it really reflects some kind of special human nature.
The logic is not clear, please correct me.
View more about Interstellar reviews
