Compared to many so-called sci-fi movies, it's so hard and sci-fi. The
interstellar voyage is so cool, especially the rotating and docking part is so cool! ! ! The effect under the IMAX screen is shocking! ! ! ! ! ! !
The happy ending at the end seems a bit forced, but I don't hate
it, but as a dead rationalist, I still have to pick some thorns, or I
can't question the fantastic part after entering the event horizon of the black hole.
After all, people can't study the interior of the event horizon, so why? It's all right, it depends on the screenwriter's preference
. Before this
, we can observe from the movie that there is a very bright
thing around the black hole. I'm not mistaken, it should be the accretion disk of the black hole, and since they radiate visible light autonomously, it must be high-temperature plasma.
The temperature should be about the same as the sun. Anyway, the
black hole that is not accessible by man-made objects and the surrounding accretion disk is basically the same as a high-temperature star.
Our protagonist's spacecraft actually passed through it and reached the black hole
. Shouldn't it be directly melted and evaporated before this? ?
Does this mean that this spacecraft has the ability to travel into the interior of the sun? ? ?
What kind of black technology is this (manually flipping the table
and
I remember the existing theory that the closer the matter is to the event horizon of the black hole, the slower the time will pass relative to the outside, the stronger the time dilation,
so from the outside observer's point of view, the matter will only gradually get closer to the event) The event horizon and almost "never" will never really enter...
That is to say, the process of the male protagonist falling into the black hole is far more than 100 years compared to the earth (external observer), and
he The nearby time point should also be in the process of continuing to approach the event horizon,
which means that there are two male protagonists in the same time and space...
In a sense, he is equivalent to going back in time.
If he finally returns to the vicinity of the black hole, he can observe his own spacecraft moving towards the event horizon of the black hole. The
observation instruments are good enough to observe the near freezing under strong time dilation. Myself--
obvious bug! !
Another problem is
not in the physical sciences,
but in the physical sciences:
since humans have the ability to colonize a completely barren planet with a suitable environment,
this shows that humans have more or less mastered the ability to control the ecological circle.
At least one The environment is suitable for the establishment of a completely empty place for human survival (such as in Antarctica)
, how can it be caused by a mere dust storm and a microbe that kills crops to cause food shortages The atmosphere is destroyed?
Directly create an isolation area, sterilize all the inside, and then introduce sterile crops. It is definitely easier and more realistic to manually control the amount of oxygen than going all the way to an alien planet... Take a
step back and say that even if the earth is really destroyed by a sandstorm,
treat the earth as a It is far simpler and more reliable to colonize an alien with a suitable environment from scratch than to find it in the universe...
The government actually chose the erratic plan of NASA instead of paying biologists to do research...
Although the things between the stars are still It's quite scientific, but the doomsday setting on the surface of the earth was not very scientific at the beginning - -
I thought about these problems for a while
View more about Interstellar reviews
