The first time I watched The Lord of the Rings seven years ago, I thought it was very exciting, especially when I saw the magnificent war scene in the third movie, I was so excited that tears filled my eyes, not to mention the seductive eyes of the two handsome guys Orlando and Aragorn... I'm not so fascinated, especially I don't like war scenes anymore, but I see a few points that I couldn't see before, maybe it's because of my age.
1. Why did Frodo send the Lord of the Rings? Other capable people can't send it, but only the purest person who can resist desire (note the word "relative") can send it. When I watched it seven years ago, I didn't think about it.
Some netizens say that The Lord of the Rings is like Journey to the West. The protagonist has a firm will and lacks ability... Yes, Journey to the West, Sun Wukong is so powerful, but why can only Tang monks learn scriptures?
Because Tang Seng's will is firm, he replaced other apprentices as captains, and the group has long since disbanded.
Because of his simplicity.
In the first part, when everyone was arguing, Fodor said, I will, and that moment touched me very much.
He doesn't have eighteen martial arts, but he has the will, so other capable people will assist him. If he wants, that's enough. Simply powerful.
2. In the end, the Lord of the Rings was destroyed, and someone died with it! Frodo was also tempted...
The final scene of the destruction of the Lord of the Rings shows the truth of human nature, and the director can be said to be very intentional.
It would be exaggerating a Hobbit if Frodo managed to throw the Ring back into Mount Doom. That's why the word "relative" is used above.
Human nature is common. The Lord of the Rings was born in Si, but it is not easy to be destroyed in Si, so everyone who took the last step finally changed his face and said greedily, the ring is mine. Remember the scene when the Elf King asked Aragorn's senior to throw the Ring back to Mount Doom, and he might not be able to do it himself!
Finally, in the struggle between Gollum and Frodo, the Lord of the Rings and Gollum perished together.
The truth of human nature is obvious. People will never give up it voluntarily, but in the competition with each other, one party becomes the victim and perishes with it.
3. What is this? Is it desire?
I'm asking, they want the Lord of the Rings, why? If a king has a Lord of the Rings, what can he do?
Xiaojie's answer: I was charmed and thought I could have powerful powers, but in fact I was manipulated.
It is probably analogous to trying to chase more power and money in the world. In fact, in the end, it is not enslaved by the desire for power and money.
It can be said to be very incisive.
View more about The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King reviews
