1. Is the invention of AI a good thing?
Humans invented AI, expecting AI to have the ability to learn autonomously until it is controlled by AI. Humans want to block solar energy by destroying the atmosphere and darkening the sky, thus cutting off the energy of AI. Unexpectedly, AI is still smarter. It uses human embryos as batteries to extract energy and simulates the "maternal world" for human consciousness activities. It is a very interesting setting.
2. If your brain is faster than AI, you can still be the savior of the liberation of human consciousness.
The first person to wake up from AI control is the savior. To grow the team little by little, I want to find small partners with strong willpower and superior thinking ability to liberate the controlled brains of human beings and let people regain their awareness of the real world. dominance. So, how strong is human reflective reasoning and willpower to overthrow the entire "world" seen, heard, and felt? And the powerful learning ability and computing power of AI come from the human brain, so of course, humans can simulate the knowledge and skills reserves needed to strengthen the battle with agents in the AI system, and practice over and over again to improve human brain computing. Speed, in the final analysis of whether the competition can save the world, is the calculation speed and ability of the human brain and Alpha, which is faster. Whether it’s kung fu or avoiding bullets, it’s all about faster brain operations and faster shots. You can even have the ability to reverse code. Crazy idea. 3. All advanced technology is worthless in the face of human primitive perception.
Even if the new savior, our male protagonist Neo, has a super-brain, wisdom, and will beyond systematic control, he still needs a "prophet" similar to psychological counseling and inspiration to give prophetic guidance, whether it is inspiration Whether it is intelligence or confidence. In short, the advice given by the prophet comes first, and the super brain is developed one by one.
So, does this mean that even if the technology has developed to the point where the virtual world of code has become a real thing, the most primitive wizard-like perception and psychic ability of human beings are still superpowers that surpass technology?
Based on this, we can speculate that when we were primitive humans in ancient times, we just ended the last world where humans were trapped by AI and controlled by AI. Human beings have been under control for a long time, so when the prophets and super brains defeated the AI-ruled world and destroyed AI, they felt that the worlds of nature, mountains, sun, fruit picking and hunting, and drilling wood for the fire, which was ignored by us, were Is it the most vital and lovely world, so let human beings return to the original development context, a new world that is natural, simple, primitive and specially created? And wizards are also the most respected communicators and prophets who can feel nature, the heavens and the earth, and all things. Therefore, there is no technology; only witchcraft is handed down as advanced technology. I just didn’t expect that human beings would be healed forever, the scars will be forgotten, and human beings will once again reproduce unrestrictedly like a virus, and once again feel that the development of science and technology is unprecedented progress, using the so-called curiosity to create AI, and once again enter a new cycle of science and technology, towards the tragedy of being controlled by AI.
So technology is not necessarily the result of our generation after the industrial revolution, isn't it?
Maybe this is something that the ancestors abandoned after the lessons of blood and tears.
4. If it were you, would you choose to swallow the blue pill that allows you to go back to your daily life without any suspense, or the red pill that makes you doubt everything you see and get doubts about the possibility of traditional physics exploring the theory of relativity? To be or not to be a proposition, be a normal person or a superhero? 5. Finally, in 1999, it was possible to produce such an avant-garde film, which makes people in the new century ashamed! A standing ovation!
And I only saw this work in 2021, ashamed or...
View more about The Matrix reviews
