The living conditions are better, and there is a DVD player and computer to watch movies, so there is a phenomenon that I directly use the word "bad movie" to evaluate movies that I don't like. How do you understand the meaning of the word "bad film"? The "Completely Bad Movies Manual" is circulating on the Internet, which defines "bad movies" in this way. "The so-called bad movies, of course, refer to those crudely crafted works that are full of loopholes in the plot, lifeless performances, messy pictures, and crooked voices. However, this is the highest standard for evaluating bad movies. It is not easy (fascinating!) to find the best bad movies that fully meet these requirements. , Or the picture fails completely. These three elements of the film failed, and the film is naturally not much better. I agree.
There are too many bad movies on the Internet. After watching a movie, everyone can shout "It's a bad movie." Everyone knows, what is your standard? Do you have a standard? Many fake movie fans have a view that they fall into the category of bad movies that fall short of their expectations. Watching "Transformers", I said it was a bad movie, because the plot was a complete failure. I need to ask here, how many people watch "Transformers", a special effects blockbuster, for the confusing plot. What they see is special effects and what they feel is shock.
This brings me to my point: every film has its own value.
If you have ever been a director, or watched a director’s guide, you will understand that any film has been devoted to the director’s efforts. Daily and night shooting, arduous location, long post-production and editing, no director is willing to spend such money and energy to "play games", and the reason why some movies are not approved by fans are indeed It is the limited level of the director and film crew. But those are all external manifestations. The director's inner intentions, psychological processes and real thoughts need to be slowly experienced in the film. Therefore, after watching a feature film, please do not jump to conclusions immediately. It is recommended to watch some filming highlights and listen to the director and actors' comments. You will gain more and have a more comprehensive understanding of film reviews.
"Meet The Spartans", with "300 Warriors" as the main axis, spoofs many movies and social phenomena. Apart from the hilarious, you can find that it is not so mediocre. It is an entertainment film because it is too spoof; it is a political film because it reflects a lot of American social reality; it is a song and dance film because the street dance showdown in the decisive battle is quite professional. It can be seen that the director is shooting with his heart, and the screenwriter is conceiving with his heart. When you hug popcorn and burst into laughter along with the story, the stress will be relieved, you will feel happy and comfortable, your work will be more efficient, and your life will be happier. The entertainment purpose of the entertainment movie has been achieved. Why is it "bad"!
Different films should be measured by different mentalities and standards.
ps: For friends who are always talking about IMDB rankings, I have a suggestion. Before watching the video, please do not check any relevant information and comments. Who ranked the IMDB rankings, and can other people's opinions represent your opinions? While emphasizing individuality more and more, the inner individuality is losing a little bit. People say that it is not good. Film reviews should be objectively and rationally analyzed, and IMDB should not be used to talk about things.
________________________________________________________
http://blog.sina.com.cn/kevinlee1001
latest Blog post: [Original] "A Letter Written on May 12, 2009-The First Anniversary of the Sichuan Wenchuan Earthquake"
View more about Meet the Spartans reviews
