However, I still admire those who can interpret the meaning of the film, at least the interpretation that can attract the approval of the majority of mortals like me. This is not easy and welcomed by everyone. It is like reading comprehension in an exam. However, it is not certain that it has restored the original intention of the author.
Having said all this, I just wanted to express that what I said was going to be written down is just my personal opinion. I don't know if I'm afraid of not having enough content in the text or I think I can make myself look more esoteric by stacking adjectives and complex sentences. I'm really bullshit.
Nolan is an amazing director, not because he can direct a stunning movie, but because he can rejuvenate a movie that has been characterized and lost its originality. This is the most amazing thing. . And this is hardly practiced. After all, there are not many such opportunities. Many people in a sequel are just trying to keep the box office and the operation of the company. thing. Many people have various complexes, whether they are on the table or not, but it seems that it is not easy to sell, so there is always a little bit of soulmate hard to find, and from time to time you have to cater to the helplessness and swaying of your vulgar tastes. But he really did stand and earn money.
If it is said that micro-movies are popular now, the beginning of "The Dark Knight" is good enough to be a good enough micro-movie, suspenseful enough and deep enough, and it also clearly reveals the topic he wants to talk about: human nature. After the mantis catches the cicada and the oriole, if you kill one, you will share the money with one less person. Since you are ordered to kill others, how can you ensure that no one will not be ordered to kill you? But human nature has never been a high-profile discussion, but Nolan dared to push him to a higher level. People on two boats facing each other, when the crowd started to get restless, I was asking myself what would I choose if I were in this situation? Not only dare to say no, but also dare to stand up and say no! When teaching the children of the debate team, I told them time and time again that life cannot be measured by quantity, nor can it be measured by quality. Many people have seen the Harvard Humanity class circulating on the Internet, but when we really face choices, when we face the lives of ourselves and others, can we stick to our principles? However, should one sacrifice for principles? Do we dare to sacrifice for principles? I thought about it for a long time and hesitated for a long time, but I finally felt that if I gave up what I have always insisted on and believed in, how would I face it in the future? Facing the object I once spoke out about, is the so-called belief just hypocrisy? insist? The answer should be no. It is difficult to define whether this group of people is inherently good or inherently evil. I believe that people can easily give birth to the seeds of evil and also have a kind heart, but I finally believe that universal values are acceptable in everyone's heart, no matter what kind of people. color, gender, wealth or knowledge. Feeling those who voted no and who ended up doing no evil has convinced me that there is value in perseverance.
The great thing about "The Dark Knight" is that he really subverts a traditional hero drama. It subverts not only the routine of the hero drama, but also completely jumps out of the limitations of the first one. Some people think that his rocket soaring on IMBD is the result of the upgrade of contemporary online public opinion and fast food culture, but "The Godfather" is classic and eternal, but it is always in the same vein as the echo of the empty valley. Batman aside, the movie can still be seen in flesh and blood for a long time, which is reason enough to be successful, because Nolan does what he wants to do, and the hero is still flying. So "The Dark Knight" has reason to get the praise he deserves, let's wait and see Nolan's next surprise.
View more about The Dark Knight reviews