I watched it this morning, and I gave it a good review. I woke up in the afternoon, discussed with my relatives and friends, and overturned the positive reviews together. Let’s talk about the good reviews first: the whole film’s shots, mirroring, narrative rhythm, lighting, editing, soundtrack, there are many remarkable places. At that time, I told Jiyou that the director's style was a bit Finch, and the footage was very informative. (This is the highest compliment a David Fincher fan can compliment any director, like David Fincher). When I came back, I saw that it was another director who had a background in making MVs. Directors who shoot MVs generally have a "common problem", that is, emotions are greater than stories. But often such directors will also have their own personal characteristics. It's a topic worth discussing, and in the case of the controversial Zack Snyder, his films can feel like the imagery is more important than the smooth narrative rhythm. But this also reflects another advantage of the MV director from a certain aspect, that is, the fineness of the control of the picture. It is not acceptable to use "MV style" to complain about the montage of several soundtracks of this film. From the perspective of narrative and story rhythm, the director chose a very good way of handling it and executed it well. Just as a representation of a movie, this movie is no big problem, the standard above 7.5. If it is based on the focus of the trailer, the score of 7.5~9 depends on personal preference. Personally, I am a movie theater with an expectation value of 8.5 or more. The score that came out was about 8, and finally got a score of 7 after taking a long nap. 5. Lots of Spoilers Below Contains Lots of Spoilers Below Lots of Spoilers When I came out of the movie theater with my friend, she said, "It's a pity that the layout restricts this movie, so it can't get any higher scores." Experience to feel the movie. Because of the advantages mentioned above, our viewing experience is very good, and we don't feel that there is anything wrong with this sentence. But when we watched the preview, the reason we decided to watch it was because of sports, passion, inspiration, "no talent" and "frustration". These are not all factors that restrict the pattern, but are the focus of elevating the pattern. We thought that when we came out, we shouldn't be talking about "The second male is really a super good-looking skin and a generally interesting soul, and the male lead is really a super interesting soul and a generally good-looking skin" But the second male is really good-looking The male lead is really funny! Whoever likes Star Wars is not a bad guy(?) This discussion determines the reason why we finally overturned the praise. First, there is no mention of the heroine. Second, there is no mention of figure skating. Third, there is no mention of "talent". First, let's talk about the image of the heroine. It was very well shaped before I was a teenager. Why did it become "love is bigger than dreams and love affects everything. It is not the loss of my dream but a man who can save me, it is not my dream but another man who can save me" female stereotypes. In the past few years, the overthrow of the inherent image and the shaping of feelings have been developing in a good direction, especially in non-romance films. Frozen, Maleficent, and even being positioned as domestic 2. 14 released La La Land. Even the positioning of a romance film is problematic. Love should be the mutual attraction between two souls. ...Forget it, a single dog is not qualified to talk about this, maybe from the perspective of romance movies, this kind of shaping is no problem, then let's talk about the next one: figure skating. Because I don't know figure skating. Because I still don't understand figure skating after I read it. My knowledge of figure skating hasn't changed at all. Third, there is no mention of talent. This is the most attractive sentence in the trailer, "What is talent?" What I want to see the most when I go to the cinema is this, what is talent. In some respects, I am also a person who is judged to be untalented, and in some respects I am also a person who is judged to be very talented. What can make me find resonance, and what I want to find resonance, is "what is talent?" . The heroine went from "no talent" to "talented (become a relatively high achievement in this field with the same effort)" The director only used a very beautiful montage to explain the growth from a little girl to a heroine These are so the evaluation I give is: the goods are wrong. The trailer is better than the feature film, at least I think so.
View more about Ice reviews
