There is no difference from the original, the director's skills are not good

Edison 2022-04-22 07:01:54

Because I read the novel before, I didn't pay much attention to the logic and detective of this film. Although the film and the novel cannot be compared, because the artistic expressions of the two sides are different, but I have to say a few words.

First of all, Shishen's love object is not good-looking, she is simply a thin woman, she should find a woman with a good-looking smile and a temperament.
Secondly, Shishen is a good actor, but his temperament is not right. I tend to look for an introverted actor like Liu Qingyun, because Shishen is a bit wretched when he laughs.

Another question is, probably out of commercial considerations, the actors Fukuyama Masaharu and Shibasaki Yuki were looking for. Are there no actors in Japan? One of these two people only knows how to show their temperament, and the other only knows how to express anger and jealousy, and they don't look good. Fukuyama is as thin as a skeleton.

The film puts the perspective on Fukuyama, and feels that the story is not deep enough. It can also be said that this story fails to express the feelings of the stone god. The director's skills are not good either, the editing and filming are really bad.

View more about Suspect X reviews

Extended Reading

Suspect X quotes

  • Manabu Yukawa: Is it harder to create an unsolvable problem or solve it?