And this film is such a representative. I have to say that the characters, atmosphere, and camera language are not bad, but the key plot logic is extremely embarrassing. This is so bad for me that I gave it 1 star. The most perfect crime in the world is not some perfect alibi, but no case at all. The corpse was directly thrown away. Anyway, the movie didn't find the corpse at the end. Without the corpse, there would be no murder case at all. If his family didn't call the police, the disappearance case would not be established. Why do you want to kill an innocent person to attract the attention of the police? You said that he is a university professor and has no common sense at all? Of course, according to what I said, the whole movie doesn't hold, at least it's not a suspense movie, but isn't the plot that puts the cart before the horse for the sake of suspense exactly what I said about suspense for suspense's sake?
I have also read an award-winning mystery novel in Japan, which is based on "No One Survives". Several Contemporary Reasoning Masters Cups gather on an isolated island, and the killing unfolds. The mechanism inside is the imagination of poor people, and finally I dare to say that no one can guess who the murderer is. Because the TMD murderer has never appeared before the decryption, and is the last person who suddenly appeared for the ending. Who can guess the identity of the murderer except the author? The motive is also what environmental protection hastily explained at the end, and it has nothing to do with the previous foreshadowing, plot, background, and character relationship. There is only one sentence in the whole book to explain the motive, half a page of the murderer, and the rest are all kinds of reasoning and tricks. This kind of thing is the reasoning award work, huh!
View more about Suspect X reviews
