When I first watched this film, I sued the gun manufacturer to select jurors for the wife of the victim of the shooting. Because I didn't understand the American judicial system, I was just starting to watch it. The film mainly revolves around the duel between the plaintiff’s lawyer and the defendant’s lawyer. With the addition of the male and female protagonists, you may feel that the protagonist is a bit mysterious in the whole movie. Later, the protagonist has always faced the original with the victory or defeat of the case. The defendant's lawyer demanded a huge amount. Finally, the plaintiff’s lawyer, adhering to the awe of the lawyer’s profession, rejected the heroine. The plaintiff’s lawyer wanted to try to stop him. He believed that justice was on his side. If he loses the case, his lawyer career will almost come to an end. Prior to this, every gun case he had fought was the result of winning the lawsuit. He did not realize that the real victory was not through his sophisticated professional skills, but through improper means to achieve success. The male and female protagonist originally came from a small town, and there were also shootings in the small town school, but almost everyone thought the case could be won, but in the end the defendant won the lawsuit. The male and female protagonists have a heart of justice, the male protagonist is careful and sensitive, and the female protagonist is brave and fearless. The two fought against the lawyers. In the end, after a fierce discussion between the male protagonist and other jurors, let them choose by heart, without any Subjective color. In the end, the plaintiff won the lawsuit.
As a lawyer, although we have to serve the client and do our best to seek benefits or reduce losses for them, we must not forget the truth of the facts and the direction of justice. Not betraying his professional ethics for any small profit, just like the defendant's lawyer, he will eventually withdraw from the behavior.
View more about Runaway Jury reviews
