Hesitating despite surviving

Donato 2022-04-22 07:01:54

Nineteen forty-two disappointed me.
The first half is a spit movie, and the second half is a personal impression.

Knowing that at the premiere ceremony, Feng touted that Liu should replace Mo Yan to win the Nobel Prize, and also knowing that Feng led a large number of people in the wild, and even more aware of the seriousness of the famine in 1942.
But, this is a bad movie.
Of course, our films are not graded. This week, Wang Meng was still talking about how films are graded, which is still difficult. But this does not mean that as long as the film passes the censorship, it can disdain the feelings of the audience. The last time the assembly trumpet was blown, the broken arms and stumps all over the ground were no problem. In 1942, Feng's camera was used uncontrollably:
young children were blown up, human brains were pierced by knives, wild dogs snatch corpses, and inexplicable leaking milk (corpse).
Making a movie in China is not as difficult as Hollywood, and it is not easy to set up a project and pass the censorship and finally enter the major theaters. But our dear director, if you support Chinese films, can you also respect the art of film? Don't give each of the above cult shots a close-up of more than two seconds, okay?

Compared to the shots, the 1942 script is even more unrestrained.
Let's count the number of lines in the movie. The
landlord, the old Fan family, the
blind deer family,
Zhang Li Peiji, Henan Province , the
judge, the priest, Fan Wei , the reporter of the
Manchurian era, Bai Xiude , and the most important thing is that with the development of the movie's plot, it could have been linked together. The lines were not angry with each other and parted ways. More story lines are halfway down, and there is no text. Probably at the end of the film, Feng also had a hard time riding the tiger, so he released a few ppts and made an ending for each line. In fact, everyone knows that no one can show the four-dimensional roughness of the panorama of the whole event in one movie time.




Feng should watch "Armageddon". The three films are about 7 hours long, but even with government funding, all manpower and resources are almost unlimited, the film still only captures the part of war and planning for war. If you don't take into account the historical material and perspective, I think Armageddon is the best war movie in the history of cinema.

In general, Feng's films are too ambitious. Although he found the right entry point, he went to see the scenery elsewhere.


=====================I am the dividing line==========================


Middle school Sometimes there is a problem of hesitation in the face of things, and until I admit it, I can't help but commit a delay syndrome. It was easy to change it, and when I saw 1942, I couldn't help but recall my own dark history.

Coming out of the movie theater, I am more certain: I will do everything in the future!
Lao Jiang: Does Henan let or fight? The result of hesitation was that he lost China.
Lao Fan: Do the bandits fight? Will the girl marry? Food to give? So the whole family died in front of their eyes
...
Everyone was phobia of choice from beginning to end. In fact, if Lao Jiang really let go of Henan, if Lao Fan Zhen fought with the bandits, it might not be a choice. (Henan people don't scold me, I'll just pretend)

View more about Back to 1942 reviews