WB is like looking into a demon mirror. No matter how famous the "famous director" is, it is not as real as a "beast". Really, a word awakens the dreamer. It turns out that in the eyes of a "famous director", the audience is a group of "people who are stupid and money come quickly". The move he supported before, but in exchange for being scolded as a "beast, a navy". My heart is cold, but I am fortunate that I no longer have to be misled by the illusory reputation, I can see the real body, and I am determined not to look at his works again.
Even if you are full of talent, and talent is worth a thousand dollars, it cannot be above your character. There is no good character, no matter how good the work is, no matter how big the investment is, it will only satirize the fallacy of the past. I have to sigh, you are old, why don't you cherish your reputation so much?
Perhaps, it is too subjective to judge one star like this. However, isn't the look and feel of a film a subjective thing? It doesn't give me a good overall feeling, do you still give you full marks against your will? ! Do we have to contribute to your movie box office from our legal labor income, so that you will continue to be proud of the audience under the banner of "famous director"? Sorry, I haven't been able to be so generous.
At the actor level, I highly respect Uncle Daoming. It's a pity that a good actor meets a bad director, so I can't go to the theater to see his style, which is a big pity. But I really couldn't cross the threshold of "being beasts", so I had to give up.
That's all.
As for the other kinds, hehe, Yuan Fang, what do you think?
View more about Back to 1942 reviews
