After watching the late starring, I searched for relevant records and reports to get a more comprehensive understanding of this real campus tragedy 20 years ago. Perhaps due to the differences of the times, and out of humanitarian concern for the victims and their countries, the voices I saw at that time were almost unanimously accusing Lu Gang of how selfish and narrow-minded, how fragile the mental capacity of young people, China How the poor education system and the conflict of interest among Chinese students have damaged the American scientific and technological elite, so on and so forth. It's frustrating to watch. There is only one point of view expressed by an international student at the time: he complained of hopelessness, loneliness, depression, and ultimately a tragedy. I feel sad for him. - I also feel the same, grief, sympathy, and will not blame him.
Dr. Lu has the inspiration of genius and the consistent diligence of all Chinese students, but his scientific research conclusions just overturned the model proposed by his admired mentor, so he could not pass the graduation defense, not to mention his dream of winning the championship Nobel Prize. In every possible way, his mentors prevented him from publishing his research results, missed job opportunities, deprived him of honorary qualifications, and even lied about graduation procedures and evaluation conditions. As a scientific worker who regards science as life, Dr. Lu did not blindly tolerate it, but tried to appeal to the school in various ways. After he failed to appeal, he stubbornly chose such a road of no return... I don't know. What will the world say about the incident at the moment, but at that time, few people saw the efforts made for justice and justice, but only the final tragic ending. I think, if there is not such a lasting cycle of effort-failure-effort-failure, how come the great pain after the fish die and the net is broken? Some are just blind, rude, and simple, but I believe that Dr. Lu is not. His helplessness is learned and cultivated gradually, and once this vicious reflex arc is established, its most helpless direction can only be destruction. One disappointment does not constitute despair, but repeated despair is true despair. I think there is a myriad of desperation for social justice behind the learned helplessness. I appreciate Rawls's interpretation of justice, taking what they need and treating them differently. If the school's inaction is based on the fear that the treatment of Dr. Lu Yiren will deprive the wider stakeholders, then the result can only be a lose-lose, because inaction will never achieve social justice.
Why was the voice from the rear of the hometown also the enduring "Youth Vulnerability Theory"? And this seems to have become a routine. As a person with a similar educational experience, I would like to say that it is true that in terms of overall characteristics, if we are to compare with our peers in the revolutionary era, we may indeed lack some so-called elements of success, such as patience and toughness, but apart from the individual factors, we cannot ignore the changes in the objective environment. In Dr. Lu's case, in a far-off country with no palpable family warmth and few like-minded friends and peers, we don't seem to see a safety net around him, enough to resist the aggressive and repeated attacks. A sense of helplessness. If you can have more emotional communication with family and friends, even if you give up your degree and change to a scientific research environment, what will be the result? If the United States is no longer the holy land of your dreams "where everything can come true," if it has left you so sad and hopeless, why not leave with your head held high? You will one day stand on the highest forum of physics to proudly announce your success to them...
The film attributes the fuse of the accident to the inexorable nature of the teacher's authority (which at first the teacher and the protagonist seem to be open and honest It was also denied in one fell swoop, which is ironic), in fact, it is just a miniature, and the real side also includes the rare achievements of institutions at all levels from small departments to large schools, which are summarized by some commentators as "campus politics". In addition to academic ideals and practical reasons, I believe that many people who choose to work in academic institutions will more or less consider the relatively simple humanistic environment here. Hearing and seeing this accident, I don't know what to think. Perhaps the reason for such a thing is rarely seen in domestic scientific research (the protagonist's roommate's words "I am now doing a molecule in my mentor's research ten years ago" seems to reveal the mystery), but it is not worthy of our congratulations—— What is the merit of those behaviors that use the dignity of teachers to justify personal reputation? The "scientific paradigm" (paradigm) that has been widely praised and recognized by the scientific community since the 1960s claims to be able to tolerate the blooming ontology, epistemology, and methodology, but how can it not tolerate a small model or conceptual framework? (conceptual framework) falsification process with enormous scientific value?
A full 20 years later, it is still necessary to bring the matter up again. In my mind, Dr. Lou is a man of Bruno's courage and intelligence, but he chose an extreme approach to dedicate himself to science and social justice. 20 years of sacrifice, I wish to rest in peace.
View more about Dark Matter reviews
