The expectations for this film are not so high, but the impression is quite good.
Mavis's role is still so small 0.0
There are not so many nasty things in the second part.
I still think that the first part is the best. The plot is better. It introduces the world view, tells a story that breaks the prejudice that humans and monsters accept each other, and there is also a relationship line between Mavis and Jonathan. The second part is monotonous about the post-marriage. Life, this main story is too little, so Dracula feels lonely, goes on vacation and then meets Van Helsing and falls in love. However, the laughs are denser, it is pleasant to look at, and the experience is better.
Still somewhat forced to continue the plot, Dracula couldn't accept it in the second spring, although he can understand it, it is still the original match. The first two were sold for people, emphasizing how much Dracula missed his old love, how loyal to the original partner, and also stressed that zing is only once, and now I force the setting to be changed. I don't like it.
In addition, I don’t like the captain’s modeling. I admit that I’m a Yan dog. The captain’s appearance is unpleasant, so I don’t support the two of them together. I don’t have a sense of cp, and the emotional line is a little rushed, just like relying on it. A zing supports their love.
Another small easter egg was found in the movie, the nine-tailed fox.
View more about Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation reviews
