In order to comply with the above requirements, Xiaofei's father is a corrupt official, and the evidence is conclusive, and he must be subject to the law in the film. But Lao Paoer personally wrote a letter to report and expose the matter, which seemed very inconsistent.
Lao Pao'er has been following the rules all his life. You have your rules, I have mine, people are in the arena, and the affairs of the rivers and lakes are resolved by the rivers and lakes. It's a rule that children can't call their parents when they fight; it's also a rule not to notify the police when the underworld is on fire. Talk about the conditions and be reasonable, you are reasonable, I apologize, this is the rule; if you can’t talk about it, you can’t make sense, say the right time and place to fight, what happens if you win, what if you lose, make an agreement in advance, and don’t break the bill afterwards, this is even more the rule .
However, here Lao Pao'er and Xiao Fei have clearly made an appointment. If Xiao Fei wins, he will take the statement and do not call the police; if Xiao Fei loses, he will lose money, and Lao Pao will handle the statement at will. Before the fight, Lao Paoer reported it first. Isn't this personally destroying the rules that he has maintained all his life?
Having said so much, I just want to say that this detail has not only affected the plot, but also the image of the character Lao Pao'er. So I think it's very inconsistent here, and it's not handled well.
Is there any other way to deal with it? It's not difficult, there are at least two ways: 1. Lao Paoer didn't report it, but someone else reported it, preferably secretly, or accidentally discovered afterwards; 2. It can be handled simply and rudely as the disciplinary inspection agency discovered it later, Just add it directly at the end by means of news, so that it does not affect the main line.
View more about Mr. Six reviews
