as a popular entertainment movie "Confucius", but it was not successful. For areas skilled in Confucius' poems, books and etiquette, the movie focuses on the image of frustrated politicians and military strategists. There is something to think about, but under this premise , there are also huge failures, the first unforgivable failure, there are too many war scenes, and the most frightening scene of burning the body is "The Masterpiece of Confucius"? The degree of inhumanity to the common people is even more than that of the overlord, which is too outrageous. The second flaw is, of course, the zero-connotation Zhou Xun who continues to open his eyes and pretend to be innocent and aura. The whole thing looks like a suddenly inserted commercial. Zhou Xun has no sign language to use in the film, let alone such a serious humanistic blockbuster. The perceptive director of this funny scene should cut it out in post-production, so as not to disappoint the efforts of all the actors, especially Chow Yun-fat's piety. Cutting it out does not affect the whole film in the slightest, and it can also save the audience a large number of nondescript laughingstocks since her appearance that the inexplicable death brought to the audience.
The third failure is of course Yan Hui's death. It's okay to be sensational. The question is why no one jumped down to save him? Ren Quan's physique is the thinnest among the actors, and he can go into the water several times. What did the rest of the burly men who watched and moaned to the end learn from Confucianism? Ren Quan is remarkable. The negligence of the main creator caused Confucius, who established the mainstream value of China, to suddenly fail to be established.
There are only these three huge failures. It can be seen that the most diligent person is Chow Yun-fat. Although the poetry and calligraphy may not be outstanding, his majesty is so gentle and heavy, I am afraid that no one can match the gentleman. Prestige, learning is not firm, looking at it just like, even if it is warm. It is the best symbol of Chow Yun-fat, and it can be seen that it is in these eight characters that he establishes his understanding and performance, and even the accent has been surprisingly changed. It's a pity that there are too many war scenes, and he is actually quite artistic in ritual and music. Confucius is more like an artist who embraces romantic political ideals. waste and mistakes.
Therefore, as a China that has no understanding of Confucius, Han Han's sentence "It's not worth taking pictures" is not without pondering. From the perspective of zero understanding, the Confucius described in the whole film is a defeated element, a lost prime minister, and a downtrodden person who has been waiting for a lifetime with kings such as Tuju. In the original script of Zeng Shengsheng, it was very simple to stress that it could defeat the means of war and move towards anti-war. For this bigger failure, we can suggest a little remedy. Every word in the lines taken from the "Analects" should be juxtaposed with the original subtitles in parentheses. The atmosphere of the movie is too chilling, why let Confucius speak the vernacular to the point where he has lost his cultural level?
Looking forward to other "Confucius", no matter what, I am happy to see countless "Confucius", co-created, maybe only began to approach "Confucius".
I still applaud the movie "Confucius", I am more focused on it than "Avatar". But not a single tear, this is not a film with tears, there are too many scenes of war, which makes people uneasy. When it comes to narrating Confucianism, it is true that the direction of failure and the loss of focus are so regretful that it almost made people cry out of the theater!
View more about Confucius reviews
