as a story telling, "Avatar" is very Hollywood, with a simple structure, compact clues, and a happy ending.
"Confucius" is very much like "The Analects of Confucius". It can't be connected with each sentence. There is a serious disconnect between paragraphs. Fortunately, "The Analects" is not a story book.
As a means of expressing visual art, "Avatar" is revolutionary, and the maturity of 3D technology is like a renaissance in the film industry.
"Confucius" has no achievements. If the fake big scene special effects just highlight the "false big empty" of the main theme, it can also be regarded as "gentle and gentle, and then a gentleman." I'm sorry, it's a hypocrite.
As a carrier of ideas, Avatar is a so-called cosmopolitanism, which has many possibilities for interpretation. The main body carries the mother's feelings for nature, and what it strongly opposes is the instrumentalization of human beings to all things and themselves, and the resulting infinite material possession and dominance.
"Confucius" expresses the so-called traditional thought and culture, with "Confucianism" as the main body, and the master of Confucianism, Confucius, lived in the poorest state of Lu. The opposite of Confucius was the slave-owner aristocracy. He could have become Outstanding politicians, but they were driven away by them. In the end, they were unlucky. Confucius let the students save them regardless of the past, so they were also moved. Because Confucius was old and could not move, he changed his career to education. home and writer. To be honest, I didn't understand what "Confucius" wanted to express. What really shocked people were those few classical Chinese words - "If ritual is harmful to others, what is the use of ritual?" People with lofty ideals and benevolent people do not want to live to harm others, but to kill themselves to achieve benevolence."
Ah, I understand, the central idea of "Confucius" is that watching more movies is better than reading more books.
Speaking of which, I don't have a special fondness for "Avatar", nor do I have a special dislike for "Confucius". It's just a movie. What a movie is, it's just an artistic expression. Being cared about by the government has turned into a slush—it can’t be supported on the wall. This is what I have always thought. To put it bluntly, "Confucius" is just "Jiao Yulu", "Kong Fansen" and so on that we have been organized to watch since we were young. The Spring and Autumn and Warring States editions of Ying Mo are just that, but they are also Ying Mo. Old Master Kong has a hard life. Among them, there are three hardships, which must be mentioned. As a substitute teacher, I still face the danger of being dismissed everywhere. If I live under the red flag, I will never fall into this place. I will be able to govern the famous poverty-stricken counties and poor townships of the Republic.
Second, the quality of the students I received was so poor that they were popular for solo flights. The only remaining belief was that the Master used to look up at a 45-degree angle. As for what he said specifically, I can't remember. Yes, so Yan Hui froze to death trying to salvage the bamboo slips that would automatically surface at the bottom of the water. What's even more tragic is that the only person in the world who understands his pain is a beautiful and unruly monarch's wife, who has not received exam-oriented education. It is easier to understand non-mainstream thinking.
Thirdly, Confucius was a first-class educator, first-class thinker, first-class writer, first-class editor, and third-class statesman in his life, but the worst performance was brought out by people again and again, again and again, and again and again to show off. It's dead, and the other schools of thought who are engaged in politics are hysterical, those who are engaged in philosophy are in the sky, and those who are ingenious in technology have no choice but to collectively lose their words and disappear on their own, lest the old master be so old and have to look for tofu. .
There is really a curse about Confucius, scolding in troubled times, worshipping the world, worshipping for 300 years, then scolding for 50 years, the curse is vicious, the praise is outrageous, the people who are dirty and stinky and worship the dead are actually a group of people. Which group of people—the group of people who believe in "Only one person can rule the world, how can the world respect one person?" Of course, they only need to do the first half of the sentence, and the second half is just like Confucius.
In my imagination, Confucius should be like a king Lear in the wilderness, roaring at the sky - "Where did I write wrong, deserve to be drowned by saliva so many times????"
But it is also possible Is my persecution paranoia at work? ! !
View more about Confucius reviews
