The following text:
The context of the movie is basically correct: During the Warring States Period, the strong preyed on the weak, and the society was in a state of disorder without rules. Order ceases to exist, while making possible the creation of a new order.
Nanzi's play. . . It is estimated that there is no way, there must be some women's play. . . Otherwise there isn't a single woman in the movie. (Second Kong's wife and daughter are counted, not counting) In fact, there is still no woman who compares to Confucianism:> In the
movie, Confucius is compassionate and virtuous. . . Actually, I don't know, nor have I seen him, but I feel that he still puts the ethical relationship between the ruler, the minister, the father and the son in the first place. That is to say, his goodness is within this framework. Of course, it is not impossible for the movie to render him as a fraternity.
The biggest failure is that it did not describe the context of the contention of a hundred schools of thought at that time. Maybe it's because if compared, Kong's second child will lose a lot of color?
As for everyone calling Confucius' martial arts a joke, this is a bit too much. Historical records record that Confucius was proficient in the six arts of ritual, music, archery, imperialism, calligraphy, and arithmetic. It is reasonable that the film focuses on his archery. And the war scene is passing by, so it can still be dealt with.
The image of the bereaved dog suits him well. His philosophy belongs to survival and death: some of his bolder and more brilliant ideas are: Taoism, Mohism and so on. Confucius is rigid, unimaginative, uncreative, superstitious in rituals, pays attention to form, and only knows Zhou Gong, so people from other schools laugh at him (how come Taoists are also a bit immortal, right? In the movie, they are farming). Whoever is in power and leads the army is the one who wins the king and loses the bandit. Who cares about him? So they laughed at him too. Confucius only became a sage after Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty exclusively respected Confucianism. During the Warring States period, he was just a genre.
That's almost it, it's just an entertainment movie, it's mainly about emotions (how kind and patriotic he is). The background of the contention of a hundred schools of thought and the underlying reason why Confucius became a lost family dog are basically not shown, so it will not become a classic.
There should be a score of 6 or 7. The director should focus on the expression of Confucius' "benevolence loves others", which is also his power.
Finally: I admire the masters at that time, not just talking about theories, but actually putting them into practice.
View more about Confucius reviews
