Today, I still chat with you through text.
Germany's "Eavesdropping" just happened to meet the negative me, and I don't want to watch that kind of political film that persecutes other people's families for the time being. Taking this opportunity, I opened Yang Dechang's film: "Terrorist". (After writing the article, I also read "One One")
"Terrorist" is also known as "Please Pretend You Will Reluctant Me" (to pass the trial), which is essentially a film about a relationship between the sexes.
The works directed by Yang Dechang have such a profound analysis of human nature. I believe that people who know about film and television have already heard of it.
However, I am inexplicably confused about the protagonist of the film. To borrow the words of my friend: I cannot "empathize" with the protagonist in the film.
I can't seem to understand why those bland marriage days are annoying. The main contradictions faced by the protagonist all stem from their married life. In the middle of the film, I even had an idea: Why throw a stone that arouses conflict into this "backwater" marriage? Simple for two people, okay? I, do not understand.
This feeling was also produced in the previous script analysis class of "Revolutionary Road". The wife, played by Kate Winslet, is also disgusted by the dull marriage life. The husband, played by Xiao Lizi, compromised his life and shattered the dream of a husband and wife. But I can't understand the so-called heartbreak between the two.
Is living a life different from others the "pursuit of freedom"? There are always many people who hate the same life as if they were copied and pasted. It seems that "different" is so fresh and exciting in everyone's eyes.
But is it really good to do so?
When I was in my twenties, sporadic newlyweds began to appear around me. Their eagerness to get married made me think: how many of them really have the ability to let themselves live a different free life? In other words, most of them need to rely on "elders" to pay for post-marital expenses. The kind of elders that most of them respected that "everything is the truth".
Young people who are eating other people's meals, but have "more different" thoughts in their hearts. I don't know where to give them the courage to keep throwing the stone that sparked the waves of marriage. Importantly,
Parents are temporarily obliged to support their children, but what about the husband and wife? Isn't it disgusting to ask the other party indefinitely?
But the heroine in "Terrorist" has exactly this feeling. She can quit her job and let her husband, who is struggling with the burden of life, follow her. In the end, it's her husband who doesn't care about her novels and doesn't give her any passion for her stagnant life. She cheated in the end, I really can't think of what excuses she can use for her lines. But she is the one who lived the most dashing and free in the ending. Why?
It is true that when a conflict occurs, both sides can find the other's weaknesses no matter what. The heroine in "Terrorist" even felt that she married a person she didn't like just for a new start in life. Complaining about the indifference of the male protagonist to her hurts this weak marriage time and time again. But behind her husband's indifference, is her work hard work. In the final analysis, you are a rose with thorns, so don't try to charm the hard-working bees.
For my marriage, I don't want such a heroine. It's not that I can't accept that others "pursue different" at all. But while you are chasing your dreams, please restrain your selfishness. In short, there must be a degree of tolerance for what others demand.
In the choice between "love me more" and "love me more", it seems that selfish people always get more benefits. But when the only remaining "love" becomes the last straw for gratuitous dedication, how can the contradictions and cracks in marriage be avoided? Who can guarantee that the "selfish" party will not be bruised and bruised like the "giver"?
There is also the number one person: Xiaoqiang, the son of a rich family, who is at ease as a photographer. For a fugitive goddess who fell in love at first sight, she abandoned her former girlfriend. But the goddess sold his camera while he was asleep. Although she repented in time in the end, this awakened Huigen of the rich son.
Returning to his girlfriend's side, he saw through the unhappiness behind the "romantic life" earlier than the annoying Yu Fen.
As for my married life, my desire for stability seems to be fighting against the liberation of my mind. Maybe I'm too young to appreciate how tormenting a life that fades into water. Maybe after I get married, I will regret the article I wrote today.
But maybe, I may still stick to my stable thoughts, as the lines in "One One" say: When you're not here, I have a chance to live the life of my youth for a while. I thought that if I lived again, maybe it would be different. The results were still similar, no different.
For "The Terrorist", maybe it's because my age group is still inexperienced, and I can't really integrate into the heart of the characters in the story. The heartache when a boring marriage is broken may not really be experienced for the time being.
In contrast, "Guling Street Teenage Murder Case", which depicts the destruction of the ideal country of young people, resonates more with me. Even after four hours, I was still intoxicated.
There is little research on other comments in this article, just to express my own feelings. Perhaps for my age, the teenage state of mind is what I understand. It's time to stop and record what you're thinking. Hence this article.
View more about The Terrorizers reviews