No one knows what the director thinks, so they can only ask the director. But the director designed the plot like this, which inevitably makes many people think that the director is justifying the extramarital affair. Because, first, the plot that the director wants to show is the cause of derailment, but the result is that the family is happy in the end. According to the cause and effect, it can be shown that the director does not exclude derailment. Second, the last line: If everything follows the rules, what's the fun in life? It also shows that the director does not exclude derailment. But at the end of the movie, the old man's loyalty to love and his nostalgia for his wife were shown. This shows that the film generally shows the director's open and tolerant thoughts, derailment of body + spirit, responsibility for maintaining a happy family, and loyalty to love. These three are not contradictory and can coexist with each other. (However, what kind of coexistence method requires everyone to go beyond the traditional three perspectives, and don’t take any of these three too seriously. The movie also shows that the old husband, the protagonist, the wife, and the mistress are well aware of the truth, In the end, we managed to take care of the three. As well as the family photo in the back, the mole on the face of the wife's second child must be deliberately arranged by the director, which is exactly the same as the chef in the restaurant.) Why do I think the director wants to show that these three can be What about harmonious coexistence? Because Xiaosan is pregnant with a child, this is the hope for the future, and you see the "happy smiles" on everyone's faces in the family portrait... Personally, I think, This smile is real because they have achieved the harmonious coexistence of the above three.
View more about Men in Hope reviews
