A bad film of two beauties

Danielle 2021-12-14 08:01:12

I just watched the dove occupying the magpie’s nest (also translated as "another Pauline girl" or "Royal Double Shu"), this is a European court drama, depicting the mother and aunt of the famous British "Queen Elizabeth" Encountered with his father Henry VIII's lust. So the cause of so much attention and interest of me is entirely because of the two leading female actors-Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson.

Natalie is one of my favorite actresses, and I believe it is the best endorsement for many men's loli episodes. Since the stunning performance in "This Assassin Isn't Cold", the world doesn't know how many men wait for her to grow up (lolicons hope she never grows up). Her spiritual eyes, beautiful and slightly stubborn lips, exuded the special charm of innocence and sexiness; while Scarlett's gestures are all sexy. To be honest, she is not the beautiful type that I think. The nose is short and curled, the nose is too big, and the lips are too thick. However, such facial features on her face, such a face on her body, can diffuse sexy Because the whole body's lines are all curvilinear, the figure needless to say, the combination of round nose and round lips that were originally considered to be shortcomings on this body has become a unique feminine attitude. Whether it is Saimo Point or Lost in Tokyo, the word "stunner" constantly pops up in people's minds. The two most promising actresses in Hollywood, women with excellent appearance and acting skills, are co-starring in the annual drama, how worth looking forward to... I

didn't expect it to be such a disappointing work. First of all, I wonder if the two deliberately challenge their acting skills? Natalie starred in the elder sister, Scarlett is the younger sister, which is in line with the real age, but does not match the perception of the two. No matter how you look at it, Natalie is thin and young, Scarlett is big and mature. Natalie's sister is "ambitious" and likes to use her charm to seduce the opposite sex, especially in seducing Henry; while Scarlett plays the innocent, gentle, skilled, and kind sister. Natalie is okay. After all, she is alive and sexy, but she can still play sexy, but she is obviously lacking in style; while Scarlett, who has lost her sexy weapons and looks more suitable for modern outfits, looks quite sluggish. Is it because the black swan that is deeply rooted in the West is evil, so the black-haired Natalie plays the older sister Ann, and the Virgin has blonde hair, so Scarlett plays the younger sister Mary?

In fact, these are not the main points. The plot made me point out... When I watched the introduction, I felt that it should be a film with a tight plot and full of tension. Who knew that the overall process was “simplified”.

It seems that the original intention of the screenwriter is to portray Ann as an ambitious, unscrupulous, insidious, and scheming woman, while the younger sister Mary is a gentle, skillful, simple and kind-hearted "Mary" mm. This simple division of black and white It almost reminds me of Korean dramas. Even the performance in the film is full of skepticism. It gave me the feeling that Natalie’s sister was innocent (simply following her uncle’s bewitching plan to seduce Henry to become a duchess, she simply wanted to be private for life, she simply hated her sister, and she simply thought that she could give birth to a "dragon breed" with her brother. Keep your position), competitive (so messed up the first attempt to seduce Henry, want to show his femininity, want to beat his sister), have a certain spirit of resistance and a preliminary feminist awakening (screaming at his father and uncle many times Rebellion, bargaining with Henry, shouting slogans of equality between men and women, instigating Henry to rebel against the Pope, etc.), loves and hates are distinct and he doesn't know how to conceal. Her so-called ambition is nothing but ambition. But intrigue and scheming, I really didn't see much, it was nothing more than using a little cleverness to seduce King Henry. It's really far worse than the sentient beings in the golden branches.

Scarlett’s sister made me feel quite illusory or simply hypocritical. Already married, after my sister messed up the seduce, as a substitute player, knowing that Henry was going to take care of Henry to be a mistress, I went to show her "virtuous and virtuous" without saying a word; I heard that my sister had set her life privately, Da Yi Ling Of course Gao Mi had a look of "I am for your own good"; let her enter the palace, she was happy to enter; Henry said "tonight", she changed clothes and dedicated herself again; after that, she was obviously very happy. When I arrived, I was "falling in" Henry; I was pregnant with a child, and when I heard that my sister was back, she was obviously jealous and angry. Later, when my sister came to power, I didn't see her intention to retire from the palace. "Forbearance" is really a big deal. Anyway, in general, this character has no personality traits. It seems to be a victim of mercy. She always lights up the close-up lens to make her blonde hair and face shine with the radiance of the Virgin. In fact, it makes people feel fake. Seducing...-_-|| Maybe I am mentally gloomy... I always feel that this is a scheming.

Henry's attitude towards the two of them is wild and rude to his sister Ann; he is protective and gentle to his sister Mary. But from the film, it is almost impossible to see how to have feelings for these two people, what kind of feelings are, that is, Henry sees one engages the other, and uses different methods to engage in... chilling. As for Henry's incomparable trust in Mary, it is even more inexplicable, because Mary took care of him when he was injured and showed his virtuous virtue. Henry trusted her beyond all else? Where is the rationality? Where is it...

In short, I was greatly disappointed after reading it. The two actresses also failed to give full play, the plot was unattractive, the character change, love-hate transformation was too fast, lack of foreshadowing and explanation, the plot was stiff, the character image was not full...too a failure~~~


ps: Tonal deviation Dark, Natalie’s Ann always wears cool colors, either blue or green. To show evil? But cool colors are hard to provoke people's desires. It's better to use charm purple or something, it's all dark blue and dark green cool colors, how to seduce men, even my interest can't seduce them. But if you have to compare the two actresses, I think Natalie is slightly better. At least Ann has flesh and blood with smiles and tears, hysterics and miscarriage pain are still good. Scarlett, a good actor, if it weren't for the director to give the shot or the light, it would really be ignored. It’s hard for the title of "Another Pauline's Girl" to refer to her, and the director seems to support her specifically...

Forget it, I’m depressed.

View more about The Other Boleyn Girl reviews

Extended Reading

The Other Boleyn Girl quotes

  • Anne Boleyn: Henry Percy

    George Boleyn: [Teasingly] Why ever would he interest you? What could you possibly want with the sole heir to the richest earldom in the whole of England?

    Anne Boleyn: [Jokingly] Oh I have no knowledge of that! I simply like his face!

    George Boleyn: Well, he's betrothed

    Anne Boleyn: Betrothed is not married. It's a long journey from bended knee to the altar.

  • Sir Thomas Boleyn: Easy for you to say! You've had position and wealth all your life!

    Lady Elizabeth: Until I married you, Thomas, and I was happy to give it all for love.