Anyone who has checked the final outcome of the Eight Hundred Warriors will not have a favorable impression of this retreat policy. They want to show that the National Government did its best, but the fact is that the National Government not only failed to do its best but harmed these people, but the film did not criticize the appeasement of the National Government. Attitude, smashed political show, and did not reflect the tragic and helpless 800 heroes (most of the dead retreated according to the command of the micromanipulation master and died on the way to retreat) The final ending of the film is obviously misleading, survived Are the soldiers treated well? The purpose of surviving in the end is to give hope to the remaining Chinese troops and teach them the spirit of the Anti-Japanese War, advanced military concepts, and the precious experience of confronting the Japanese army. Has this purpose been achieved in history? Neither answer. Personally, I think that as a director of a war history film, there are too many personal political opinions mixed in. The film's special effects war is restored very well, the rhythm is relatively tight, and the narrative techniques are interspersed well, and there are few advantages of impression. To sum up, I can only give two stars at most. I cannot accept that a historical war film based on a famous battle does not restore all the causes and consequences of the battle, but also whitewashes the retreat thought of the National Government at that time.
View more about The Eight Hundred reviews
