The bad point is that I still feel that there is no urine point in the whole scene during the sixth brush, and I can widen my eyes for fear of missing a scene to watch this film.
...don't be kidding... just a brain-crazy fan like me, when I rewatched Innocence and 2001: A Space Odyssey, and when I was distracted, this movie is completely, completely, no, yes! !
For those who are already fully familiar with the plot, there is still no shortage of intelligence density, which means that there is a problem with the rhythm of this film. The director is too eager to put all kinds of things that suggest turning his own ideas into every picture, but he forgot or because of his inexperience, he did not consider that the audience not only wants to eat, but also digest. For a person with a swipe, the time and space required for digestion is completely insufficient.
Most of the people who acted as the main force of tap water on the online media have swiped N times. After watching it for the first time, the plot line and background of the story, the way of emotional transition and every detail regurgitated in their hearts, and they had enough time to ferment and make up their minds, so what they saw must be the same as the one they saw. The person who brushes sees it very differently. But unfortunately, unless it's a director like Dead Duck and a company that earns too much money, the movie is still mainly for people who only watch it once, and their viewing standards need to be taken into consideration. .
Leaving aside the connotation and meaning, among the films I have seen, the live-action film with the highest plot completion is "The Shawshank Redemption" and the cartoon is "Super Marines". The rhythm of the latter's plot setting is comparable to the highest achievements of industrial products produced in the industrial era - every foreshadowing, turning point, lyric, and narrative are reasonably smooth and so that people wonder if they are using the kind of surveillance game developed by Russia. A tool for the effect content has on the player's brainwaves. This is a benchmark film suitable for all ages, which means that cute children can understand it, and adults can accept it directly without brains. Even so, the protagonist of the lyrical narrative is still simplified to the greatest extent, and only characteristic modules are extracted.
And our red-haired monkey is as complex as Shawshank.
Shawshank's completion is achieved by the actors' excellent performance, the film's precise focus and hints on the protagonist. Although its information transmission is realized by lines, line hints, scene hints, facial expressions and bystander descriptions, it is still simply and rudely stuffed into the audience's mind, and does not require the audience to think hard to understand.
Then the length of the movie is 142 minutes, which is enough emotional accumulation.
After six brushes, I can probably understand why the plot is written like this. In addition to the havoc in the Heavenly Palace at the beginning, the emotional force of this film is in the process of the monkey trying to break the seal three times. The first time also explained the process of the monkey running out, the second time was the accumulation of power by memory killing, and the third time was the release process embellished with memory killing. Memories killing is a must, so we need to write down the process of the memories, and then... there is no time to put other things, so we can only make some transitions.
This Plot is simply awesome for writing fanboys, but it's too hasty as a formal plot.
Officials can't just throw flash points, providing fertile soil is the real thing.
Finally, let's praise:
As a brain-crazy fan who has been gnawing on "Journey to the West" since childhood and just to watch monkeys, I really can't accept the setting of monkeys falling in love. Therefore, "The Legend of Wukong" is just a matter of reading it. I have never wanted to watch the big talk about Journey to the West and Journey to the West. This monkey this time absolutely meets my ideals in terms of strength and personality.
And as a star who has been afraid of children for thousands of years, it is a miracle that Jiang Liuer can make me feel impatient from beginning to end.
As Miaomiao said [the film's intention is still very clear and is currently lacking in domestic films, love and justice].
This direction is very good, even if it is vulgar, it is necessary. The next question is how to tell the story well.
View more about Monkey King: Hero Is Back reviews
