Hitchcock, Horror, Anthony Hopkins, Helen Mirren, Scarlett Johansson... this series of bomb nouns, superimposed together, not only does not have the effect of 1+1=4, they even get it. A negative number, I have to say that this film failed home.
The film is based on Hitchcock’s creation of "Scary" as a clue to bring out his demons (creative bottleneck, infatuation with beautiful women, and doubts about his wife), while also supporting the little-known behind the scenes The writer (Hitchcock’s wife is his soul screenwriter) was pushed to the front of the screen.
Who is Hitchcock? A master of suspense and thriller who has paid tribute to a generation of film circles, he is also a master of editing, bringing the horror to the audience through superb perspective and lens editing. At the same time, he has an uncontrollable obsessive-compulsive disorder for blonde beauty, so much control that many actresses who are praised by him are anxious to get rid of him, or in other words, under such suffocating mental control, his heroine They all performed the expressions of fear, fright, and anger he expected. One by one they achieved Hitchcock's ultimate effect in painful performances. Some of them broke up with him after the filming. This was also suggested in the film "Hitchcock", and he called them "ungrateful".
However, the clues in "Scary" did not organize and present the master's suspenseful techniques to the audience. What we saw was Anthony Hopkins wearing a stiff mask, almost facially paralyzed in the various emotions of the master of suspense. The actor had to use his eyes to convey information, but his immobile face reduced all the scenes from the eyes, which was worse than wearing a mask. Of course, this pot can only be left to the makeup artist. Who is the actor?
Scarlett is still very beautiful and graceful, but this role plays Janet Lee. There is not much storytelling in itself, so there is not much room to play. Regrettably, there is almost no role left in this film for the actor who played the original actor Anthony Perkins in "The Cry", and the success of the Cry itself is at least half of the credit for Perkins' superb acting skills. It was also by him that held up a piece of "Scary". In my opinion, Psycho does not have a heroine, because he plays the role of a male and female skewers alone. "Hitchcock" does not have too many comments or set interpretations for Perkins, which is really disappointing.
The one with the most pen and ink is Hitchcock's wife Elma, played by Helen Mirren. Without her as a screenwriter, Old Hitchcock is already a talent. The actress' acting skills are nothing to say, but I am puzzled again. The title is "Hitchcock". The old man's acting skills are not expressive enough. The clues to "Scary" are just the structure of the whole drama. The old aunt's scenes are a bit too much, and a lot of ambiguous scenes with lovers really want to watch 4x fast.
I can’t see the key points, but I’ve clicked them so far, but there are too many extensions; I don’t want to contribute to the acting. Helen Mirren is good, but the structure of the play itself is crooked. It made me feel disheartened, and as soon as it was over, I went straight to the old movie "Horror" n to brush it off, let's appreciate how the real Hitchcock used black and white light to show the inside of the characters.
View more about Hitchcock reviews
