After watching it, I found that this is not a movie that is very in line with the modern people's pursuit of reverse suspense detective type, but if it is placed in the era of the novel, this should be a very great reasoning, the whole process of the case and the motive for the murder are shocking enough , but for us who have watched too many complex crimes and suspenseful content, it may not be so novel and attractive. Maybe the point of the movie is not to let the audience feel the complex murder process restoration, but to let the audience feel the complex murder process. This detective’s perspective sees many details. For example, different people choose different locations and different ways to ask questions. The woman who was a geography teacher and someone related to the Armstrong case can use these details to restore the motive for the crime. Maybe It's not that hard to guess and exciting, but at the end of the film, we see Poirot's loneliness, and the fact that he is no longer the one in the opening scene where one foot stepped on the dirt, in order to balance the pursuit of rationality and the other foot dirty. A balanced person, judging from his compromise in jurisprudence and ethics, things in the world are not just two kinds of right and wrong...
View more about Murder on the Orient Express reviews
