In the past, when I watched movies, I always said "the dilemma of love and justice", but that's not really difficult. Under the baton of justice, the heroic protagonist will not choose to sacrifice justice for love, only villains can Love falls into Avici hell, as for who can get the audience's favor. . . After all, it is not the main creator of the work who has the final say. Perhaps it is because he discovered the monotony and limitations of the choice of love. More and more works are now tending to the choice of justice and law. The law should be the reality of justice. Unfortunately, it is difficult for the law to be equal to justice at any time, so the writer They have huge room to play.
According to my vague memories, I watched the classic movie "Murder on the Orient Express" at least twice when I was a child, but I didn't have any impression of the plot at all. Even when I watched the new version, it didn't evoke any valuable memories. All the memories are of a pretentious old man and a group of passengers pretending to be noble. The only scene I remember is when everyone gathers in the restaurant of the train and listens to the old man to solve the mystery, but the worst thing is that the mystery is completely lost. Maybe it was because he was too young at that time, and there was not much entanglement about good and evil, and the ending seemed so natural.
During the three-day train journey, 12 passengers from all over the world committed a murder collectively, with internal and external aid, channels and tools. . . Everything was planned so perfectly, but in the end it was still "if you want people to know nothing, you must do it yourself".
At the moment when the victim's true identity is exposed, all plans are doomed to fail. In this section, all the people in the closed car are too easy to be linked together by a dead little girl. This is also a secret room killing, but a murderer Trapped in a secret room. Of course, it's not easy to guess exactly which 12 people are, but as long as one person can possibly be identified as the murderer, the murder is a failure.
An innocent kidnapper died, and a group of kind-hearted people became murderers. Who should be responsible for this murderous feast? If the law can really uphold justice, why the kidnappers can take the Orient Express to death with ransom, in fact, there are many helpless laws. . . If the law cannot achieve the goal of justice, does that mean that people can use lynching to achieve the ideal of justice? So what is the point of the law, and where can one find any sense of security in a world full of lynchings? Is it a celestial cycle or a vicious cycle? When I was little I could have stood on the side of justice without hesitation, but now I hesitate because I am not sure what justice is. . .
View more about Murder on the Orient Express reviews
