I don't know what kind of mentality it is to give a star, this film hasn't rotted to a star yet. But there are 4 major flaws that have to be said. First, the actors' acting skills and lines are too embarrassing. The overall acting skills of the villains are better than the positive characters. The positive characters are also the acting skills of Jackie Chan and Miya. Others, the overall Waterloo, especially the little girl and her bodyguard boy! Second, the special effects are too fake! When I watched Jackie Chan's "Who Am I" when I was a kid, I used a real lion, but now I'm using a fake one, and I don't care about the special effects. Not even as good as Die Hard and Mission Impossible a dozen years ago. Third, the positioning of the movie is too vague! Positioned as a war movie, it is not serious and real enough. Positioned in the police and gangster shootout film, it is not bloody enough, let alone violent aesthetics. Let's count kung fu comedy, its comedy effect and martial arts action are several grades worse than Jackie Chan's early works! Let's say it's a New Year's film. It's not lively enough, and there aren't many big names supporting the movie. It's a typical four different things. Fourth, the details! Although this movie has some patriotic feelings and Chinese elements from time to time, the control of details is far worse than that of Ye Wen! For example, in Ye Wenzhong, all English lines did not appear a single Chinese, they all said chinaman! Why is Chinese not good? When I was in junior high school, my English teacher said that Japanese people don't like Europeans and Americans to call them japenese, because the suffix ese is often used to describe bugs. This is actually insulting. Ip Man's crew should know that, so The lines are all chinaman, not chinese. Obviously, the crew of "Pioneer" either knew too little or didn't care!
View more about Vanguard reviews
